2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedge funds, insiders, and the decoupling of economic and voting ownership: Empty voting and hidden (morphable) ownership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
69
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Christoffersen et al (2005) document the existence of a market for corporate votes within the equity-loan market (see also Hu and Black, 2006, for other examples of markets for corporate votes). The equity-loan market is a market that facilitates, for a price, the borrowing of equity for short periods of time.…”
Section: Corporate Vote Buyingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, Christoffersen et al (2005) document the existence of a market for corporate votes within the equity-loan market (see also Hu and Black, 2006, for other examples of markets for corporate votes). The equity-loan market is a market that facilitates, for a price, the borrowing of equity for short periods of time.…”
Section: Corporate Vote Buyingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Manne (1964), Clark (1979), and more recently Andre (1990), Hasen (2000) and Levmore (2000) presented informal arguments in favor of vote buying but they either ignored or otherwise dismissed the problem of looting or the possible existence of bad equilibria as discussed by Cole (2001) and others (see also the recent paper by Hu and Black, 2006). In 1985, in response to the brisk merger and acquisition activity of the early 1980s, a group of Wall Street professionals suggested decoupling shares and votes for short periods of time to facilitate vote buying transactions but did not submit a formal request to the Securities and Exchange Commission (Rent-A-Vote?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stulz (2009) Another related literature deals with the decoupling of voting and cash- ‡ow rights in common equity through the judicious use of derivatives to hedge cash- ‡ow risk. Hu andBlack (2006, 2007) and Kahan and Rock (2007) argue that such decoupling can give rise to the opposite voting preferences from those of unhedged common equity holders and thus to ine¢ cient outcomes, such as voting for a merger which results in a decline in stock price of the acquirer and pro…ts those who have built up short positions on the …rm's stock. More recently Brav and Mathews (2009) have proposed a theory of decoupling in which the hedging of cash- ‡ow risk can facilitate trading and voting by an informed trader, but where it can also give rise to ine¢ cient voting when hedging is cheap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, often the minorities vote on key managerial decisions such as mergers and acquisitions (Bethel et al, 2009). As a consequence, investors may acquire voting rights just to in ‡uence the outcome of M&A proposals (Hu and Black, 2007), because their preferences in voting give them some power, and the ability in a¤ecting board composition is proportional to the minorities protection rights ensured by the legal environment (Kim et al, 2007). Hubbard and Palia (1995) show that the acquisition of minority stakes increases the acquiror's pro…ts as soon as the managerial ownership is su¢ ciently high, otherwise the agency costs of equity would reduce the acquiror's private bene…ts of control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%