2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijmf-09-2017-0194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedge fund variables and short-run SEO returns

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine if hedge fund variables (HFVs) are associated with short-run daily buy and hold abnormal returns (BHARs) for a 30-day window around announcement dates for seasoned equity offerings (SEOs). Design/methodology/approach This paper utilizes the event study metric that computes BHARs. These BHARs are used in a regression model as dependent variables with HFVs and nonhedge fund variables (NFVs) as independent variables. For regression tests, standard errors are clu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be 0.2780 if we used 2018 spreads. The latter is consistent with the empirical research by Hull et al (2018) who find an average DV of 0.263 for their sample of 1189 seasoned equity offers for firms that are smaller in size and would straddle the small and large firm size classifications given by Damodaran (2020). Finally, the medium ratings of A3 and Baa2 we find for OCRs for all of our PT and CC tests are consistent with that reported by Morningstar (2019), as these ratings are by far the most common ratings.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…It would be 0.2780 if we used 2018 spreads. The latter is consistent with the empirical research by Hull et al (2018) who find an average DV of 0.263 for their sample of 1189 seasoned equity offers for firms that are smaller in size and would straddle the small and large firm size classifications given by Damodaran (2020). Finally, the medium ratings of A3 and Baa2 we find for OCRs for all of our PT and CC tests are consistent with that reported by Morningstar (2019), as these ratings are by far the most common ratings.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Damodaran [34] reports an average near 0.3 for a ratio composed of market debt to capital asset. Hull, Kwak, and Walker [40] analyze a sample of smaller 1189 seasoned equity offerings from 1999-2010 and find a similar value. While there can be great variation in what individual FPOs consider as their optimal target credit rating, it is likely that a typical FPO will achieve its ODV at a BBB rating that (for the most recent credit ratings) corresponds to an ODV that could approach 0.4.…”
Section: Costs Of Borrowingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The use of BHAR and ABHAR is not frequent in the event study methodology of small durations. However, looking on to the scale of daily abnormal returns, the compounded measure of BHAR and ABHAR is mathematically and economically much superior to the simple addition nature of CAR and CAAR in portraying the actual economic impact(Hull et al, 2018) (see Appendix B). .03 ly log-normal returns of the index i in the estimation window, i.e., (-120 to -1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BHAR in the event window(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) for G-7 and BRICS…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%