2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-to-light currents at NNLO in SCET and semi-inclusive decay

Abstract: We perform the two-loop matching calculation for heavy-to-light currents from QCD onto soft-collinear effective theory for the complete set of Dirac structures. The newly obtained matching coefficients enter several phenomenological applications, of which we discuss heavy-to-light form factor ratios and exclusive radiative decays, as well as the semi-inclusive decayB → X s ℓ + ℓ − . For this decay, we observe a significant shift of the forward-backward asymmetry zero and find q 2 0 = (3.34 +0.22 −0.25 ) GeV 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For completeness let us mention that the symmetry breaking corrections to r BF ⊥ were computed to O(α s m 0 b ) and O(α 2 s m 0 b ) in [6] and [28,29] respectively. Even though the twist expansion of LCSR is not JHEP08(2016)098 a 1/m b -expansion, as first stated for B → P and B → V decays in [16] and [30], it is of interest to examine the various twist-quantities from the viewpoint of the standard heavy quark scaling prescriptions [16].…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)098mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For completeness let us mention that the symmetry breaking corrections to r BF ⊥ were computed to O(α s m 0 b ) and O(α 2 s m 0 b ) in [6] and [28,29] respectively. Even though the twist expansion of LCSR is not JHEP08(2016)098 a 1/m b -expansion, as first stated for B → P and B → V decays in [16] and [30], it is of interest to examine the various twist-quantities from the viewpoint of the standard heavy quark scaling prescriptions [16].…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)098mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dictionary between the two notations is shown in table 12. 29 The definition of G v ⊥ is adapted such that A remains as in [97] and (φ , g [46,96]. The third and fourth line indicate the reference to the formal and explicit solution of the DAs.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)098mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the dependence of ln ν needs to be separated from the jet function, while the ln ν dependence requires to be factorized from the hard functions C T (T ) . Following [41] the distinction between the renormalization and the factorization scales can be accounted by writing…”
Section: Jhep02(2016)179mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression assumes that we determined the operator ultraviolet renormalization factors Y ab from the general expression (14), using another regulator than dimensional for the infrared divergences, but then use (15) in the matching relation since the QCD side (11) is calculated with dimensional regularization as infrared regulator. In this relation we eliminate the four-flavour coupling by the D-dimensional relationα s = ξ −1 45 α s , where ξ 45 = 1 + O(α s ) is expanded as in (12).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Matching Qcd To Scetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What we add, besides confirming a technically highly non-trivial calculation, is an analytic expression for the charm and bottom mass dependence arising from massive quark-loop insertions into the gluon propagator. This should be useful for the NNLO calculation of the remaining penguin amplitudes that we plan to address in a later work [14]. We also discuss the numerical impact of the two-loop correction on B → ππ, πρ, ρρ branching fractions and branching fraction ratios, updating some results of [5], which are now available with NNLO accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%