2018
DOI: 10.1101/303255
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences

Abstract: In RNA-seq differential expression analysis, investigators aim to detect genes with changes in expression across conditions, despite technical and biological variability. A common task is to accurately estimate the effect size. When the counts are low or highly variable, the simple effect size estimate has high variance, leading to poor ranking of genes by effect size. Here we propose apeglm, which uses a heavy-tailed Cauchy prior distribution for effect sizes, resulting in lower bias than previous shrinkage e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
342
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
342
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes with less than ten reads in more than 75% of the samples were removed. Genes were tested for differential expression using DESeq2 v1.18.1 (Love et al, 2014) with shrinkage estimator apeglm v1.0.3 (Zhu et al, 2018) (Table S6). Gene Ontology category GO:0006955 was used to classify immune response genes.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes with less than ten reads in more than 75% of the samples were removed. Genes were tested for differential expression using DESeq2 v1.18.1 (Love et al, 2014) with shrinkage estimator apeglm v1.0.3 (Zhu et al, 2018) (Table S6). Gene Ontology category GO:0006955 was used to classify immune response genes.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, differential expression was performed for each pair of flasks describing the before and after of an ALE experiment. We utilized an adaptive t prior shrinkage estimator (Zhu, Ibrahim and Love, 2018) to transform the log fold changes for better ranking and visualization of the differential expression results. Scatter plots of differential expression levels utilized the shrinked log fold changes ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Differential Expression Analysis Of Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering on all mapped gene counts was performed to exclude genes where the sum of counts in all the conditions was inferior to 10 counts. Default parameters were used with DESeq2 including the shrinks log2 fold-change (FC) estimated for each tested comparison [35,36]. A log 2 Fold Change and its standard error were generated in addition to a P-value (p-value) and a P-adj (Adjusted p-value) to account for the false discovery rate.…”
Section: Bioinformatic Pipeline and De Novo Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%