The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/min9020085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy Mineral Variability in the Yellow River Sediments as Determined by the Multiple-Window Strategy

Abstract: In this study, heavy mineral analysis was carried out in different size fractions of the Yellow River sediment to extract its end-members. It shows that heavy mineral contents, species, and compositions vary in different grain sizes. Distribution curve of heavy mineral concentration (HMC) and particle size frequency curve are in normal distribution. In most samples, the size fraction of 4.5–5.0 Φ contains the maximum HMC (18% on average). Heavy mineral assemblages of the Yellow River are featured by amphibole … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyse the morphology of detrital zircon grains, the size fraction of very fine sand (63-125 µm) was chosen because it contained a high percentage of heavy minerals in the Yangtze sediment, which allowed for the relatively easy optical observation of mineral grains [3]. The separation of heavy minerals abided by the standard procedures described by [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyse the morphology of detrital zircon grains, the size fraction of very fine sand (63-125 µm) was chosen because it contained a high percentage of heavy minerals in the Yangtze sediment, which allowed for the relatively easy optical observation of mineral grains [3]. The separation of heavy minerals abided by the standard procedures described by [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large river deltas and marginal seas receive large quantities terrigenous sediments, making them ideal sites for the study of source-to-sink systems and land-sea interaction on multiple spatiotemporal scales [1][2][3]. In order to carry out source identification effectively, multiple technical means including bulk-sediment geochemistry, heavy minerals analysis, and single-mineral in situ analysis are widely applied [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After drying in the oven with a temperature of <40 • C, the very fine sand and coarse silt fractions were then put into a sodium polytungstate solution (2.90 kg/dm 3 at 20 • C; e.g., [5,21,28]) and heavy minerals were separated from the light fraction by the gravity separation method (e.g., [14,29]). The content of the heavy minerals (HMC) is calculated as the total mass of the heavy mineral fraction contained in the analyzed fraction [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the horizons that are enriched in authigenic pyrite likely correspond to high RSL periods with paleo-cold water mass and muddy deposition, which was not developed exclusively in the Holocene (Wang et al, 2014b;Mei et al, 2016). Conversely, horizons enriched with flake minerals, which are characteristic minerals of the Yellow River, may indicate that the paleo-Yellow River was close to the study area with a lower RSL (Figure 4G; Qin et al, 2018;Jin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Mis3a (45-25 Kyr)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As previously mentioned, detrital mineral ratios are a more effective method for provenance discrimination. The Yellow River is characterized by more hornblende and garnet, while the Yangtze River contains more epidote and sphene (Wang et al, 2007;Jin et al, 2019). There are similar qualities between hornblende and epidote, as well as garnet and sphene.…”
Section: Qualitative Discrimination Of Provenances Using Heavy Minera...mentioning
confidence: 99%