2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu and Cr(III)) removal from water in Malaysia: Post treatment by high quality limestone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
159
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
159
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1); however it provoked a slight pH increase and slight lowering in Cr ( sorption. But in the case of the forest soil and the granitic material, this amendment increased Cr(VI) sorption as compared with samples having similar pH values, which can be attributed to precipitation with carbonates, as signaled by Aziz et al (2008) studying chromium retention on limestone. Figure 3 shows chromium desorption percentage for the various materials after being added with 100 mg L −1 Cr(VI).…”
Section: Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…1); however it provoked a slight pH increase and slight lowering in Cr ( sorption. But in the case of the forest soil and the granitic material, this amendment increased Cr(VI) sorption as compared with samples having similar pH values, which can be attributed to precipitation with carbonates, as signaled by Aziz et al (2008) studying chromium retention on limestone. Figure 3 shows chromium desorption percentage for the various materials after being added with 100 mg L −1 Cr(VI).…”
Section: Sorptionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Both metals [i.e., Cu(II) and Zn(II)] were removed faster by the RY sample than any of the others, confirming the significant role of chemisorption as a removal mechanism for zinc, as well as for copper. In the carbonaceous clay (RS), metal binding was lower at the beginning of the experiment, probably because of the surface interaction (physisorption) combined with slow dissolution of carbonate minerals that usually constitutes the first step of metal removal by carbonates (Sanchez and Ayuso 2002;Aziz et al 2008;Sdiri et al 2012a). However, the difference in removal rates between the RS and RY samples gradually diminished with contact time, and the effects of carbonates was clearly shone after 60 min (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also increase the concentration of heavy metal ions, such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu) and chromium (VI) in water resources (Aziz et al 2008). The toxic nature of heavy metals has caused serious health problems for human, and they can accumulate in the environment (Rahmani et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%