2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metal removal from synthetic wastewaters in an anaerobic bioreactor using stillage from ethanol distilleries as a carbon source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eh measurements were in the range of -150 mV to -330 mV and coincide with peak hydrogen sulfide generation just prior to the formation of the ZnS aggregates across treatments. This observation supports other research with similar redox conditions noted in biogenic ZnS investigations (Castillo et al, 2012, Gonçalves et al, 2007. As stated previously, no ZnS phases were observed in the Abiotic Control that was amended with Zn but with no addition of cells, thus it is unlikely that any metal-sulfide generation can be attributed to abiotic factors.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Solid Phase Investigationssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eh measurements were in the range of -150 mV to -330 mV and coincide with peak hydrogen sulfide generation just prior to the formation of the ZnS aggregates across treatments. This observation supports other research with similar redox conditions noted in biogenic ZnS investigations (Castillo et al, 2012, Gonçalves et al, 2007. As stated previously, no ZnS phases were observed in the Abiotic Control that was amended with Zn but with no addition of cells, thus it is unlikely that any metal-sulfide generation can be attributed to abiotic factors.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Solid Phase Investigationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This was proposed in this experiment, where mass balance calculations showed an overwhelming large sulfate removal compared to measured hydrogen sulfide production. Sulfur transformation from sulfate to sulfide is considered a 1:1 stoichiometric conversion, thus in control treatments where no metals are present to react with sulfide species, the moles of sulfate reacted is expected to equal the moles of sulfide produced (Edwards et al, 1992 (Gonçalves et al, 2007;Jong et al, 2003;Nagpal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Solution Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was repeated 5 times for each sample. H 2 S production, pH, E h , SO 4 2− and Cd concentrations were determined on collected samples. Each test was performed twice and average values were reported.…”
Section: Batch Tests Of Cadmium Abatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological remediation using sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) can be performed in active systems such as off-line sulphidogenic bioreactors [4] or passive systems such as biological permeable reactive barriers (PRB) [2]. PRB has been successfully used for the treatment of a variety of contaminants, including the treatment of AMD and the remediation of streams polluted by heavy metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous reactor systems for heavy metal removal with freely suspended cells require high residence time to prevent washout of the cells, although the use of immobilized cells on carrier matrix with high surface area allows short residence times and maintains high biomass retention and reaction rates [102]. Various types of bioreactors have been used for studying the process including (semi-)continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR) [100,103], upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) [104][105][106], fluidized bed reactors (FBR) [107], permeable reactive barriers (PRB) [108], etc.…”
Section: Sulfate Reduction and Heavy Metal Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%