1975
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-ion fusion cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is different in the case of heavy reaction systems, because the decay of the excited compound nucleus through the emission of charged particles can be negligible and the separate measurements of the CF cross section can be achieved. Many measurements of the CF cross sections have been performed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. * sgzhou@itp.ac.cn Several methods have been adopted to investigate the influence of the breakup on fusion reactions around the Coulomb barrier [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is different in the case of heavy reaction systems, because the decay of the excited compound nucleus through the emission of charged particles can be negligible and the separate measurements of the CF cross section can be achieved. Many measurements of the CF cross sections have been performed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. * sgzhou@itp.ac.cn Several methods have been adopted to investigate the influence of the breakup on fusion reactions around the Coulomb barrier [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, D f us could not be extracted from the reported fusion cross sections [7,18], because only a few data points were available for differentiation. Therefore, a rough comparison of the experimental D qel was made with the theoretical D f us , extracted EPJ Web of Conferences 163, 00039 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201716300039 FUSION17 from the fusion cross sections calculated using the coupled channels code, CCFULL [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used the available ICF cross-section data for 6,7 7 Li+ 159 Tb [19] reactions are compared and shown with filled circle and filled diamond symbols, respectively. It is evident from this figure that t-ICF cross-sections are much more dominant compared to ones for α-ICF crosssections at all the measured energies with 7 Li projectile.…”
Section: Interesting Observations From Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident from this figure that t-ICF cross-sections are much more dominant compared to ones for α-ICF crosssections at all the measured energies with 7 Li projectile. Intuitively, we expect this behavior as triton while approaching the target sees lower Coulomb barrier compared to alpha particle approaching the target, hence the cross- 7 Li+ 197 Au [18], and (d) 7 Li+ 159 Tb [19] reactions are compared with filled circle and filled diamond symbols, respectively. It is evident from the figure that t-ICF is dominant compared to α-ICF at all the measured energies.…”
Section: Interesting Observations From Thementioning
confidence: 99%