1982
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(82)80036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy gas dispersion models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(A.1), (9) in (8) Thus, it can be expected that Eq. (11), considering formal reasons only, would yield a model useful for the analysis describing the concentration generated by a ground-level puff including the effect of dry deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(A.1), (9) in (8) Thus, it can be expected that Eq. (11), considering formal reasons only, would yield a model useful for the analysis describing the concentration generated by a ground-level puff including the effect of dry deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reactive or water miscible/soluble gases often have a higher v d than nonreactive or immiscible gases. A dry deposition velocity in the range of 1.6-3.7 cm s −1 has been reported in literature for Cl 2 not take dry deposition into account because it is believed to be of minor significance compared to other factors [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The reader is referred to detailed model descriptions found in other papers.) Similar models which might be modified in a like manner are summarized by Blackmore et al (1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There now exists a fairly well developed and reasonably satisfactory theory for the prediction of stochastic mean concentrations during turbulent diffusion of dense gases (Blackmore et al, 1982;Ermak et al, 1982;. Unfortunately for hazard analysis purposes, short-term ('instantaneous') concentration profiles differ markedly from theoretical mean ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%