1992
DOI: 10.1021/ja00034a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heats of formation of organic molecules. 2. The basis for calculations using either ab initio or molecular mechanics methods. Alcohols and ethers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Briefly, it consists of calculating an energy using Hartree-Fock or density functional theory, and converting it to a heat of formation using bond and group equivalents and statistical mechanical terms. It can be summarized in the equation:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Briefly, it consists of calculating an energy using Hartree-Fock or density functional theory, and converting it to a heat of formation using bond and group equivalents and statistical mechanical terms. It can be summarized in the equation:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atom-additivity was intuitively presumed and was posteriori justified in terms of the repeated success in predicting D f H o by many variants of the above scheme. [24][25][26][29][30][31] Explicitly retaining the terms associated with vibrational energy and other temperature-dependent contributions may not achieve much unless very high levels of theory are used. Also, given the significantly greater computational cost of evaluating the vibrational frequencies, these terms like other implicit deficiencies in theory may be lumped in the empirical atomic correction terms to be estimated using reliable experimental D f H o data for a small representative ''training'' set of molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repasky et al 31 used the scheme popularized by Allinger et al 24 , 61 bond and group equivalents of the same lineage and computationally less demanding semiempirical methods for energy computation. For a set of 583 neutral, closed-shell molecules containing carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen the MAD was found to be 9.6, 9.2 and 12.5 kJ/mol for the AM1, PM3 and MNDO methods, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The atomic equivalents (AEs) and group equivalents (GEs) approaches, which are originated from the same concept, have been explored by several research groups. [45][46][47][48] Though AE and GE predictions are more accurate than those obtained from atomization and isodesmic or homodesmic reactions, their accuracies are still less than satisfactory. [49] Besides, deficiencies of DFT in describing the protobranching stabilization are still there, as these methods simply ' 'translate' ' the computed enthalpies into predicted enthalpies of formation via the optimized equivalents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%