2006
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transport in the Red Lake Bog, Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatlands

Abstract: Abstract:We report the results of an investigation on the processes controlling heat transport in peat under a large bog in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatlands. For 2 years, starting in July 1998, we recorded temperature at 12 depth intervals from 0 to 400 cm within a vertical peat profile at the crest of the bog at sub-daily intervals. We also recorded air temperature 1 m above the peat surface. We calculate a peat thermal conductivity of 0Ð5 W m 1°C 1 and model vertical heat transport through the peat using t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data reveal a temperature inversion that occurs in the late fall as seen in another peatland study (e.g., McKenzie et al, 2007) (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Pressure Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These data reveal a temperature inversion that occurs in the late fall as seen in another peatland study (e.g., McKenzie et al, 2007) (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Pressure Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One source of error is the effect of temperature variations on the gas content estimated from the CRIM model. As previously stated, we assumed the temperature of the pore water throughout the peatland is 4.8°C and that variation in peat water temperature below 1 m is normally less than 4°C during the month of August [ McKenzie et al , 2007]. To specifically address the potential error that may be attributed to our lack of detailed temperature data we conducted a sensitivity analysis as shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher velocities around 0.045 m ns −1 , this maximum possible error is reduced to 1.2% estimated gas content. Based on consistencies of peat temperature observed by McKenzie et al [2007], we believe that it is unlikely that the temperature estimates are off by more than 4°C, and this is accounted for in the following error analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applying the Complex Refractive Index Model to estimate gas content we accounted for variability in ɛ r ( w ) due to differences in temperature between the top (12.5°C) and bottom (4.5°C) of the peat column based on data previously collected at the Red Lake II study site during the summer season of 1998. McKenzie et al [2007] showed vertical temperature variation from over a 4 m depth profile with intervals deeper than 2.5 m showing little variation throughout 1998–1999, suggesting that the lower layers of peat have consistent temperature conditions. Detailed estimates of vertical variations in porosity are not available from the study sites.…”
Section: Petrophysical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%