1963
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(63)90012-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer in annular passages—hydrodynamically developed turbulent flow with arbitrarily prescribed heat flux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their turbulent heat transfer results, Sudo et al [14] are not able to distinguish any difference between one-sided and two-sided heating in their prototypic MTR channel. In a semi-empirical study of flow in annular spaces, Kays and Leung [26] analytically extended their experimental results for heated annuli to the case of parallel plates, determining that the Nusselt number for one-sided heating is lower than that for heating on both sides, where the effect has a strong dependence on the Prandtl number. Using their tabulated solutions, it is possible to plot the ratio of Nusselt numbers for one-sided heating to two-sided heating, under otherwise similar conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their turbulent heat transfer results, Sudo et al [14] are not able to distinguish any difference between one-sided and two-sided heating in their prototypic MTR channel. In a semi-empirical study of flow in annular spaces, Kays and Leung [26] analytically extended their experimental results for heated annuli to the case of parallel plates, determining that the Nusselt number for one-sided heating is lower than that for heating on both sides, where the effect has a strong dependence on the Prandtl number. Using their tabulated solutions, it is possible to plot the ratio of Nusselt numbers for one-sided heating to two-sided heating, under otherwise similar conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some problems connected with the wall temperature calculation when using the Hammouda model are considered by Agafonova & Paramonova (2013). It was shown that the temperature variation across the near-wall vapor layer and therefore the change in the physical properties of vapor may be considerable and produces an essential effect on the heat transfer and drag friction in vapor as compared with their values at constant physical properties of vapor (Petukhov, 1967;Kays & Leunge, 1963). According to our calculations (Agafonova & Paramonova, 2013) for the conditions of the experiments by Chen (2011) the wall temperature (t w , o C) was nearly two or three times as large as compared with the interfacial surface (or the liquid core surface) temperature which is equal to the saturation temperature (t s , o C).…”
Section: Heat Transfer and The Wall Temperature Calculations In The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our calculations (Agafonova & Paramonova, 2013) for the conditions of the experiments by Chen (2011) the wall temperature (t w , o C) was nearly two or three times as large as compared with the interfacial surface (or the liquid core surface) temperature which is equal to the saturation temperature (t s , o C). It is known (Petukhov, 1967;Kays & Leunge, 1963) that for given situation: where Nu -the Nusselt number at the varying physical properties; Nu nc -the Nusselt number at the constant physical properties.…”
Section: Heat Transfer and The Wall Temperature Calculations In The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have measured the heat transfer and the friction factor of the tube specimen in the helium flow loop, testing the operating capabilities of the apparatus. We chose the tube geometry because it has been studied extensively (e.g., Ede, 1961, Kays andLeung, 1962), and there are correlations for fully developed turbulent flow in circular tubes which we can compare to our results. We note that these correlations were developed for conditions of much lower heat flux, and for geometries which allowed better access to wall and fluid temperatures, than for our specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%