Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9047-4_179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Transfer from Insulated Rutherford Type Cables Immersed in Pressurized He II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However experimental evaluation of heat transfer can be found in literature [10], [11], and, even if the data cannot be directly compared between each other, being based on different experimental set-up, they confirm the remarkable efficiency of a porous insulation for small increase of cable temperature.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However experimental evaluation of heat transfer can be found in literature [10], [11], and, even if the data cannot be directly compared between each other, being based on different experimental set-up, they confirm the remarkable efficiency of a porous insulation for small increase of cable temperature.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the conductor surface was machined to reproduce the external cable surface, helium could not penetrate inside the conductor; therefore the cable cross-section below the λ temperature T λ was not isothermal. The setup developed at KEK to qualify the LHC MQXA interaction region quadrupoles made use of resistive cables with the same geometry of the superconducting ones, thus allowing superfluid helium (He II) to fill the interstices among strands [12] [13]. Heat transfer studies carried out at CERN were performed in a first stage on a segment of a superconducting LHC dipole coil [14].…”
Section: T 5oraa-03mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss rate was 1.63·10 12 protons·s -1 , obtained with collimation settings (TCP7 at 6.1 σ, TCS7 at 10.1 σ [37]) that were more open than during standard operation, thus creating higher losses in the magnets. The heat deposit, averaged over the inner layer cable, was calculated to be 50 mW/cm 3 [35] [36].…”
Section: Quench Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental procedure was reported [9], brief experimentation describes here. Technical parameters for the cable and insulation, and curing parameters for the specimens are summarized in TableI.…”
Section: A Experimental Setup and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%