2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer enhancement in latent heat thermal energy storage using copper foams with varying porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series pattern, the heat transfer is limited by the biggest thermal resistance (lowest thermal conductivity), however, in a parallel pattern, even if there is a considerable thermal conductivity resistance, the heat could be conducted into the sink through the other resistances. As a result, comparison between Equations (30) and (31) reveals that the overall thermal resistance in series mode is larger than the parallel one, leading to restriction of the heat transfer rate and consequently, delays the melting process of PCM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a series pattern, the heat transfer is limited by the biggest thermal resistance (lowest thermal conductivity), however, in a parallel pattern, even if there is a considerable thermal conductivity resistance, the heat could be conducted into the sink through the other resistances. As a result, comparison between Equations (30) and (31) reveals that the overall thermal resistance in series mode is larger than the parallel one, leading to restriction of the heat transfer rate and consequently, delays the melting process of PCM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 They proved that by designing the foam porosity in gradient form, uniform melting pattern and temperature distribution could be obtained for foam-PCM heat sink or TES unit. In another two-dimensional modeling of the TES unit, 30 the foam porosity pattern applied linear variation in horizontal and vertical directions. The optimum porosity pattern resulted in an enhancement of average heat flux by 3.54% and reduction of melting time by 4.26% compared to foam-PCM with a uniform porosity of 94%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are often based on either play/design with the tune geometry of the device or system for TES usage [12] or to increase the thermal conductivity of the PCM-based composite. The latter can be achieved by using additions and/or high-conducting particles such as carbon microfibers [13,14], fine materials such as copper [15], graphite [16], aluminum [17], bronze [18], nickel and stainless steel [19], graphene nano-platelets [20], and carbon nanotubes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the thermal conductivity of most inorganic PCMs are less than 1.0 W (m À1 K À1 ), whilst organic PCMs have even lesser thermal conductivity values of 0.2 W (m À1 K À1 ). 11,31 Such low thermal conductivity of PCMs could lead to low heat transfer rate, resulting in slow heat exchange performance during melting and solidication processes. Furthermore, in a LHTES system, the major cost is associated with the heat transfer technology that employs to achieve a large amount of heat charge/discharge rates to achieve high efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] LHTES is the most promising method in this eld due to the excellent phase change behavior [5][6][7] and high heat storage capacity. 8,9 Up to now, phase change materials (PCMs) for the LHTES have been widely investigated in building energy storage, such as building insulation walls, 10 phase change cement boards, 11 solar space cooling and heating applications in buildings. 12 Among all types of PCMs organic PCMs have desirable characteristics including a suitable melting temperature, negligible supercooling through phase change, outstanding phase transition performance, and non-toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%