2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5143275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer enhancement and reduction in low-Rayleigh number natural convection flow with polymer additives

Abstract: The effects of viscoelasticity, here caused by polymer additives, on Rayleigh Bénard convection flows are investigated via direct numerical simulations at a marginally turbulent Rayleigh number. Simulations with a range of polymer length and relaxation time scales show heat transfer enhancement (HTE) and reduction (HTR). The selection of HTE and HTR depends strongly on the maximum extensional viscosity of the solution, whereas the magnitude of heat transfer modification is a function of both the maximum extens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where L is the characteristic length of the PMs, β is the thermal expansion coefficient of water, g is the gravitational acceleration, and μ is the kinematic viscosity of water. Based on this, to further distinguish buoyancy-driven convection from laminar fluid flow or turbulent fluid flow, Rayleigh number, [50,51] Ra = VL/μ = L 3 βg∆T/μ 2 for both optofluidic systems is discussed. In the case presented in Figure 6a,b (500 ns case), Ra ≈ 10 −12 for the SLR-based optofluidic system and Ra ≈ 10 −13 for LSP-based one.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Response Of the Pmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L is the characteristic length of the PMs, β is the thermal expansion coefficient of water, g is the gravitational acceleration, and μ is the kinematic viscosity of water. Based on this, to further distinguish buoyancy-driven convection from laminar fluid flow or turbulent fluid flow, Rayleigh number, [50,51] Ra = VL/μ = L 3 βg∆T/μ 2 for both optofluidic systems is discussed. In the case presented in Figure 6a,b (500 ns case), Ra ≈ 10 −12 for the SLR-based optofluidic system and Ra ≈ 10 −13 for LSP-based one.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Response Of the Pmsmentioning
confidence: 99%