1937
DOI: 10.1021/ie50335a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Transfer Coefficients in Falling Film Heater Streamline flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the q cond values for the studied compositions (especially when comparing the foaming agent emulsion and EA-5 solution with other liquids) differed significantly at identical heating temperatures. The choice of expressions for the calculation of Nu numbers was made in the analysis of the main conclusions [30,[32][33][34][35][36]. Similar to generalization of experimental results in the study [12], possible heat losses are not taken into account in this work when calculating the values of specific heat fluxes.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the q cond values for the studied compositions (especially when comparing the foaming agent emulsion and EA-5 solution with other liquids) differed significantly at identical heating temperatures. The choice of expressions for the calculation of Nu numbers was made in the analysis of the main conclusions [30,[32][33][34][35][36]. Similar to generalization of experimental results in the study [12], possible heat losses are not taken into account in this work when calculating the values of specific heat fluxes.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we make the following assumptions: Hot streams supply heat to MR only. No heat transfer between hot streams is allowed. For each data set, the stream compositions, pressures, DPTs, and BPTs are all known constants through the entire bundle. All inlet and outlet temperatures in the data sets are the actual inlet and outlet temperatures of the streams in the MSHE bundle. The film heat‐transfer coefficient $ h_i^n $ for a hot stream i in data set n is given29, 30 by $ h_i^n = \alpha _i \left( {M_i^n } \right)^{0.8} $ , where α i is a parameter that depends on fluid and exchanger properties. The film heat‐transfer coefficient $ h_j^n $ for a cold stream j in data set n is given31, 32 by $ h_j^n = \beta \left( {f_j M_{MR}^n } \right)^{0.25} $ , where β is a parameter that depends on fluid and exchanger properties. Fouling and other thermal resistances are negligible, and the overall heat‐transfer coefficient is given by which is a function of f j only. …”
Section: Minlp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The film heat‐transfer coefficient $ h_j^n $ for a cold stream j in data set n is given31, 32 by $ h_j^n = \beta \left( {f_j M_{MR}^n } \right)^{0.25} $ , where β is a parameter that depends on fluid and exchanger properties.…”
Section: Minlp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 [4], a rotameter and a heater [6] (for temperature control) and then through the scraped-film exchanger [8] back to the reservoir. To avoid oxidation of the ferrocyanide solution, nitrogen gas blanketed the storage tanks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%