1971
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(71)90094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer and fluid flow in porous fuel elements and thermal shields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was accomplished by maximizing both the surface area of the external convective boundary and the convective heat transfer coefficient. The flow regime within the cooling jacket is fully developed turbulent, thus the convective heat transfer coefficient is maximized by selecting channel dimensions (within practical limits) that yield the largest Reynolds number [38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was accomplished by maximizing both the surface area of the external convective boundary and the convective heat transfer coefficient. The flow regime within the cooling jacket is fully developed turbulent, thus the convective heat transfer coefficient is maximized by selecting channel dimensions (within practical limits) that yield the largest Reynolds number [38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity values of UO 2 and ThO 2 fuel rods are shown, depending on temperature in Table 5.1 of Reference [27]. These values are defined analytically in W cm À1 0 C À1 as follows: The UO 2 has the disadvantage that its thermal conductivity is the lowest of all kinds of nuclear fuels; metal, carbide, nitride [1].…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was caused by low temperature absorption due to the existence of element H in the moderator (H 2 O). The thermal equilibrium will be achieved when the neutrons are slowed down in the moderator [7].…”
Section: Model Parameter and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%