2016
DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2016.1216255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat stress and dehydration in adapting for performance: Good, bad, both, or neither?

Abstract: Physiological systems respond acutely to stress to minimize homeostatic disturbance, and typically adapt to chronic stress to enhance tolerance to that or a related stressor. It is legitimate to ask whether dehydration is a valuable stressor in stimulating adaptation per se. While hypoxia has had long-standing interest by athletes and researchers as an ergogenic aid, heat and nutritional stressors have had little interest until the past decade. Heat and dehydration are highly interlinked in their causation and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
51
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(158 reference statements)
1
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary finding does not support the suggestion that dehydration provides an additional stimulus for the induction of HA (Garrett et al, 2012, 2014; Périard et al, 2015; Akerman et al, 2016). The data from the short-term phase are somewhat at odds with recent work indicating that dehydrating during 90 min daily exercise-heat stress within a 5-day isothermal HA programme facilitated some aspects of HA (Garrett et al, 2014), but the reason for these discrepant findings is unclear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our primary finding does not support the suggestion that dehydration provides an additional stimulus for the induction of HA (Garrett et al, 2012, 2014; Périard et al, 2015; Akerman et al, 2016). The data from the short-term phase are somewhat at odds with recent work indicating that dehydrating during 90 min daily exercise-heat stress within a 5-day isothermal HA programme facilitated some aspects of HA (Garrett et al, 2014), but the reason for these discrepant findings is unclear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…However, the fitness of our participants [VO 2max 57(7) mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; PPO 338(49) W)] was comparable to Garrett et al (2014) [VO 2max 60(7) mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; PPO 340(30) W] and greater hypohydration lacks ecological validity, could impair some training adaptations (Judelson et al, 2008) and in rodents at least, might impair aspects of the genomic (Schwimmer et al, 2006) and phenotypic (Horowitz et al, 1999) adaptation to heat. A more sustained stimulus might be required to optimize the rebound hypervolemic response (Akerman et al, 2016), but the drinking regimes were virtually identical and earlier, rather than later, carbohydrate-electrolyte fluid replacement is crucial for recovering PV following ~3% body weight loss (Kovacs et al, 2002). Alternatively, because fluid consumption may need to exceed fluid losses by ~50% to restore euhydration in a hypohydrated individual (Shirreffs and Maughan, 1998), the ad libitum intake of fluid, electrolyte and protein following the permissive dehydration may have been insufficient to enable any additional hypervolemic adaptation (Kay et al, 2005), but this is not supported by the stable daily baseline body mass and (euhydrated) urine osmolality and while there was some evidence for reduced blood volume change in HA De , this appeared to be during the decay, rather than induction, phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations