1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-232x(98)00018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat stability analysis of embankment on the degrading permafrost district in the East of the Tibetan Plateau, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific application that drove the development of this method, to determine the upper boundary conditions for a permafrost thermal model, provides a basis for the quantitative analysis of permafrost interaction with changing surface conditions. Compared with previous methods, including empirical relations (Li et al ., ; Lai et al ., ; Niu et al ., ) and theory‐based formulae (Greuell and Konzelmann, ; Ling and Zhang, ), the method presented here has the advantage of using physically based numerical models for global and regional climate, and using local observational data to calibrate model predictions prone to systematic error and biases. An important advantage of this approach is that it allows researchers to use GCM predictions of future climate change to assess likely changes in conditions at a site by downscaling through a RCM and regression equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific application that drove the development of this method, to determine the upper boundary conditions for a permafrost thermal model, provides a basis for the quantitative analysis of permafrost interaction with changing surface conditions. Compared with previous methods, including empirical relations (Li et al ., ; Lai et al ., ; Niu et al ., ) and theory‐based formulae (Greuell and Konzelmann, ; Ling and Zhang, ), the method presented here has the advantage of using physically based numerical models for global and regional climate, and using local observational data to calibrate model predictions prone to systematic error and biases. An important advantage of this approach is that it allows researchers to use GCM predictions of future climate change to assess likely changes in conditions at a site by downscaling through a RCM and regression equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a calibrated model has been developed for past or current conditions, either with or without engineering structures, an additional challenge in assessing the potential impacts of future climate scenarios is to construct sufficiently detailed time series of future climate parameters at the appropriate spatial scale to drive the model. In some past work, thermal changes in the upper boundary condition have been driven by a temperature change function using a constant warming rate (Kane et al ., ; Li et al ., ; Lai et al ., ; Wen et al ., ). In contrast, Sushama et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods can be used to simulate the freeze–thaw process of permafrost (Wei et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2016), predict future permafrost distribution trends (Ni et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2018), and estimate active layer thickness (Pang et al., 2011; Qin et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2012). Many statistical–empirical models (Li et al., 1998; Zhang et al., 2008) and numerical models (Harlan, 1973; Riseborough et al., 2008; Taylor & Luthin, 1978) have been developed to study the relationship between temperature and stability in frozen soil or artificial earth and rock dams (Su et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011). However, there are as yet few numerical modeling studies of moraine dams in cold and high‐altitude mountainous areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, field-scale inspections of soil engineering properties commonly utilize field observations and measurements on soil surfaces that require surveyors to walk along the entire structure, such as slope and embankment [13][14][15], in-situ monitoring techniques such as piezometers and clinometers [16,17], and destructive techniques such as excavation and drill-holes [18][19][20]. However, direct observation and monitoring with these methods remain expensive from both human and equipment resource perspectives, and the results are based on several single-point values, which may be unreliable and incomplete and, more importantly, may disturb the original soil pattern, resulting in less accurate evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%