Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-2746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Shield Cavity Parametric Experimental Aeroheating for a Mars Smart Lander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the mission concept-development phase, the entry vehicle was to be bolted to the cruise stage through the forebody heat shield. Testing of various cavity diameters and locations in the NASA Langley 20-inch Mach 6 Air Tunnel [110][111] showed that these penetrations would produce turbulent wedges on the forebody at Reynolds numbers well below those of natural smooth-body transition. Figure 17 is a sample thermal phosphor image from this test series.…”
Section: A Ground Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the mission concept-development phase, the entry vehicle was to be bolted to the cruise stage through the forebody heat shield. Testing of various cavity diameters and locations in the NASA Langley 20-inch Mach 6 Air Tunnel [110][111] showed that these penetrations would produce turbulent wedges on the forebody at Reynolds numbers well below those of natural smooth-body transition. Figure 17 is a sample thermal phosphor image from this test series.…”
Section: A Ground Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous MSL configuration (also a 70 deg sphere cone) was tested in the Langley Research Center Mach 6 air tunnel with an emphasis on heating augmentation due to possible forebody heat shield penetrations [3]. The results showed that turbulent heating levels downstream of isolated roughness elements on the lee side of the vehicle were large, and in fact exceeded even the smooth-wall computational predictions [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Ref. 3, the estimated experimental uncertainty of the heating data is approximately ±13%.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The computations and correlations are presented in this paper, while the wind tunnel data are presented in the companion paper by Liechty in Ref. 3. Comparisons of both laminar and turbulent aero heating predictions with the experimental data are also presented, as are predictions for the peak heating condition during Mars entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%