Heat sensitivity of photosynthetic electron transport varies during the day due to changes in sugars and osmotic potential

Abstract

In water-stressed leaves, accumulation of neutral osmotica enhances the heat tolerance of photosynthetic electron transport. There are large diurnal and day-to-day changes in leaf sugar content because of variations in net photosynthetic production, respiration and retranslocation. To test the hypothesis that diurnal and day-to-day variations in leaf sugar content and osmotic potential significantly modify the responses to temperature of photosynthetic electron transport rate, we studied chlorophyll fluorescence rise temperatures (i.e. critical temperatures at break-points in fluorescence versus temperature response curves, corresponding to enhanced damage of PSII centers and detachment of pigment-binding complexes) in the dark at a background of weak far-red light ( T FR ) and under actinic light ( T L ), and responses of foliar photosynthetic electron transport rate to temperature using gas-exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques in the temperate tree Populus tremula L. Sucrose and sorbitol feeding experiments demonstrated strong increases of fluorescence rise temperatures T FR and T L with decreasing leaf osmotic potential and increasing internal sugar concentration. Similar T FR and T L changes were observed in response to natural variation in leaf sugar concentration throughout the day. Increases in leaf sugar concentration led to an overall down-regulation of the rate of photosynthetic electron transport ( J ), but increases in the optimum temperature ( T opt ) of J . For the entire dataset, T opt varied from 33.8 °°°° C to 43 °°°° C due to natural variation in sugars and from 33.8 °°°° C to 52.6 °°°° C in the sugar feeding experiments, underscoring the importance of sugars in modifying the response of J to temperature. However, the correlations between the sugar concentration and fluorescence rise temperature varied between the days. This variation in fluorescence rise temperature was best explained by the average temperature of the preceding 5 or 6 days. In addition, there was a significant year-to-year variation in heat sensitivity of photosynthetic electron transport that was associated with year-to-year differences in endogenous sugar content. Our data demonstrate a diurnal variation in leaf heat tolerance due to changes in sugar concentration, but they also show that this short-term modification in heat tolerance is superimposed by long-term changes in heat resistance driven by average temperature of preceding days.Key-words : day-to-day variation, diurnal variability, heat stress, optimum temperature, osmotic potential, photosynthetic electron transport, sugar concentration.Abbreviations : F 0 , basal fluorescence yield; F m , maximum fluorescence yield; F m ′ , light-adapted maximum fluorescence yield; F S , steady-state light-adapted fluorescence; J , photosynthetic electron transport rate; PSI, photo-system I; PSII, photosystem II; Q , photosynthetic quantum flux density; T , temperature; T D , fluorescence rise temperature (break point) in dark without far-red light; T FR , fluo...

Tropical forest responses to increasing atmospheric CO2: current knowledge and opportunities for future research

“…It was also suggested that increased allocation to the NSC pool may be a general response to stress, indicating more severe carbon limitation to growth, rather than vice versa (Wiley and Helliker 2012). Further, high soluble sugar concentrations in the leaves may improve their ability to photosynthesise at high temperatures (Hüve et al 2006). If these assertions are correct, there may not be a direct negative relationship between the size of the NSC pool and the ability of tropical trees and lianas to increase growth in response to elevated c a .…”

Temperature responses of the Rubisco maximum carboxylase activity across domains of life: phylogenetic signals, trade-offs, and importance for carbon gain

“…There is a large variation in temperature responses of photosynthesis both within and among species, as well as significant daily and seasonal variations Niinemets et al 1999;Medlyn et al 2002a, b;Hüve et al 2006;Kattge and Knorr 2007). Over the short term, such as rapid temperature fluctuations during the day, changes in temperature dependence of photosynthesis may result from alterations in the CO 2 concentration at the carboxylation site and modifications in the rate of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation by Rubisco and RuBP regeneration (Medlyn et al 2002a, b;Kattge and Knorr 2007).…”

Responses of photosynthesis to high temperatures in oak saplings assessed by chlorophyll-a fluorescence: inter-specific diversity and temperature-induced plasticity

“…T c can be influenced by a series of environmental parameters like ambient temperature (Dreyer et al, 2001;Havaux, 1993;Robakowski et al, 2002), water availability (Epron, 1997a;Havaux, 1992;Ladjal et al, 2000) and plant growth regulators like ABA (Havaux, 1992;Ivanov et al, 1992). T c varies largely with season, in parallel to ambient temperatures, and increases during summer and decreases during autumn (Froux et al, 2004;Hüve et al, 2006). Large increases of T c can be induced by increasing ambient temperatures over a few days as shown in silver fir (Robakowski et al, 2002).…”