2016
DOI: 10.1289/isee.2016.4391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat-Related Morbidity and Mortality in New England: Evidence for Local Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show promise for the use of regionally specific health evidence to inform and calibrate heat alert protocols (22). Further, graduated heat alert protocols may help warn for low, moderate, and peak adverse health impacts.…”
Section: Statementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show promise for the use of regionally specific health evidence to inform and calibrate heat alert protocols (22). Further, graduated heat alert protocols may help warn for low, moderate, and peak adverse health impacts.…”
Section: Statementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our assessment is comprehensive in scope and scale, and has implications for current and future risk management related to heat exposure. Prior assessments that have tried to identify heat alert thresholds based on heat-health risk relationships are either city-specific or for communities covering a few states (11,22). This study's novelty lies in the comprehensive assessment of heat exposure on various morbidity outcomes, including those that are less well characterized in published literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature and mortality are linked not only at hot extremes, such as during heatwaves, but also at temperatures that are moderately hot (Gasparrini et al, 2015; Lee et al, 2014). Owing to their more frequent occurrence, small temperature changes at mild or moderate temperatures can have larger health impacts than changes at extreme levels, such as during heat or cold waves (Gasparrini et al, 2015; Sarofim et al, 2016; Wellenius et al, 2017). We do not address cold‐related mortality given its complexities and uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined health‐relevant meteorological hazards as either present (above a hazard‐specific, health‐relevant threshold) or absent on each day during the warm season (May–September): (1) “Excessive heat days” are days with maximum heat indices greater than or equal to 95 °F (35 °C); (2) “heavy rainfall days” are days with liquid water equivalent precipitation greater than or equal to 1 inch (2.54 cm); (3) “O 3 exceedances” are days with 8‐hr O 3 maxima greater than or equal to 70 ppb; and (4) “PM 2.5 exceedances” are days with 24‐hr mean PM 2.5 concentrations greater than or equal to 35 μg/m 3 . The heat index threshold is based on the guideline criteria for issuance of heat advisories by the National Weather Service (NWS) for the region (National Weather Service, n.d.; Wellenius et al, ), the threshold for heavy precipitation was informed by the implicit characterization of a heavy rainfall day for the northeast in the Third National Climate Assessment (Kunkel et al, ), and the air quality thresholds are based on U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are codified by the Clean Air Act.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%