2022
DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2022.2067423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat recovery in ventilation systems in different climates: energy and economic comparison in old and new schools in COVID-19 pandemic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noro and Zilio [23] in a previous study compared different systems (sensible or total heat recovery, heat pump, heat pump coupled to a recuperator) by dynamic simulation, demonstrating that they allow significant non-renewable primary energy savings. Energy analysis highlighted that thermodynamic heat recovery, that is, coupled use of sensible or total heat recovery and reversible heat pump, is the most advantageous configuration for school ventilation both in colder and humid climates like Milan and in milder climates like Palermo, even more when increasing ventilation flow rate (as desirable in the COVID-19 pandemic) and for new or retrofitted buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noro and Zilio [23] in a previous study compared different systems (sensible or total heat recovery, heat pump, heat pump coupled to a recuperator) by dynamic simulation, demonstrating that they allow significant non-renewable primary energy savings. Energy analysis highlighted that thermodynamic heat recovery, that is, coupled use of sensible or total heat recovery and reversible heat pump, is the most advantageous configuration for school ventilation both in colder and humid climates like Milan and in milder climates like Palermo, even more when increasing ventilation flow rate (as desirable in the COVID-19 pandemic) and for new or retrofitted buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%