2008
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200800463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat of Adsorption for Hydrogen in Microporous High‐Surface‐Area Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
104
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
104
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is called dissociation and chemisorption. The chemisorption energy is typically in the range of E Chem ≈ 20 -150 kJ/mol H 2 and thus significantly higher than the respective energy for physisorption which is in the order of 4-6 kJ/mol H 2 for carbon based high surface materials (Schmitz et al, 2008). Fig.…”
Section: Basics Of Hydrogen Storage In Metal Hydridesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This process is called dissociation and chemisorption. The chemisorption energy is typically in the range of E Chem ≈ 20 -150 kJ/mol H 2 and thus significantly higher than the respective energy for physisorption which is in the order of 4-6 kJ/mol H 2 for carbon based high surface materials (Schmitz et al, 2008). Fig.…”
Section: Basics Of Hydrogen Storage In Metal Hydridesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Experimentally, however, a correlation between pore size and heat of adsorption is observed. 42,43 Ref. 28 adjusted Bhatia and Myers' formula for the optimal heat of adsorption in the context of hydrogen storage by taking into account the positive correlation found between enthalpy and entropy changes upon adsorption.…”
Section: Model 2 and The Entropy-enthalpy Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The adsorption of hydrogen at 293 K and 1 bar amounts to a meager ∼0.06 wt% (Fig. S29 ‡), but it significantly exceed the interpolated value for MOF-5 43 or HKUST-1 (0.1 wt% at 20 bar; 35 the dependence is practically linear in the 1-20 bar pressure) and also much more than the measured ∼0.01 wt% (298 K, 1 bar) for single walled nanotubes (SWNT) 44 or for active carbons (the interpolated value is 8 × 10 −3 -1 × 10 −2 wt% at 298 K). 45 Interestingly, the affinity towards hydrogen is strong and the desorption is almost absent on the time-scale of minutes, however it might be only a kinetic effect.…”
Section: Sorption Studies Of Degassed [Cu 4 CL 4 L(dmf) 5 ]·Dmfmentioning
confidence: 99%