1990
DOI: 10.1029/jb095ib12p19475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat flow in the Oregon Cascade Range and its correlation with regional gravity, Curie point depths, and geology

Abstract: New heat flow data for the Oregon Cascade Range are presented and discussed. Heat flow measurements from several deep wells (up to 2500 m deep), as well as extensive new data from industry exploration efforts in the Breitenbush and the Santiam Pass‐Belknap/Foley areas are described. The regional heat flow pattern is similar to that discussed previously. The heat flow is about 100 mW m−2 in the High Cascade Range and at the eastern edge of the Western Cascade Range, It is about 40–50 mW m−2 to the west in the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also discussed possible magnitudes of the shear stress, and concluded that the effect of shear heating must have been low in California outer arc. This result agrees with the results of thermal studies on the present subduction zones [Ziagos et al, 1985;Blackwell et al, 1990aBlackwell et al, , 1990bHyndman and Wang, 1993;Wang et al, 1995;McKenna, 2002] that effect of frictional heating at the slab tops are not significant. Thus, the California outer arc seems to have had a ''typical'' subduction zone thermal setting from the Laramide period up to the cessation of subduction [Dumitru, 1991].…”
Section: Subduction Thermal Regimesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…He also discussed possible magnitudes of the shear stress, and concluded that the effect of shear heating must have been low in California outer arc. This result agrees with the results of thermal studies on the present subduction zones [Ziagos et al, 1985;Blackwell et al, 1990aBlackwell et al, , 1990bHyndman and Wang, 1993;Wang et al, 1995;McKenna, 2002] that effect of frictional heating at the slab tops are not significant. Thus, the California outer arc seems to have had a ''typical'' subduction zone thermal setting from the Laramide period up to the cessation of subduction [Dumitru, 1991].…”
Section: Subduction Thermal Regimesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[34] With heat flow values of 30 ± 3 mW m À2 (Figure 2a), and low paleogeothermal gradients (5 -15°C km À1 [Dumitru, 1991]), the California outer arc must have had lower heat flow values than Cascadia outer arc (40 ± 2 mW m À2 [Lewis Blackwell et al, 1990aBlackwell et al, , 1990b); even though they are genetically similar. Part of the high heat flow in the Cascadia outer arc has been explained by the thermal blanketing effect of a thick sedimentary cover in front of the outer arc [Blackwell et al, 1990b;Hyndman and Wang, 1993;McKenna, 2002].…”
Section: Subduction Thermal Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5C). These depth estimates are based on surface heat flow values of 0.03-0.04 W·m −2 that agree with the observed depression of isotherms in most forearc mantle wedges, even those of relatively hot origin such as the Cascadia subduction zone (38,39). Moreover, our thermal calculations are in agreement with more complex geodynamic models (40,41), confirming that the 122°C isotherm is reached at ∼10,000 mbsf in forearcs.…”
Section: Depth Limit For Microbial Life Within Subduction Zone Forearcssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, new data recently described by Ingebritsen et al [ 1993] further support the thermal regime in the Cascades described by Blackwell et al [1982, 1990a]. Fluid flow certainly plays a part in the heat transport, as described in detail by Blackwell et al [ 1990a]. However, the high heat flow west of 122øW cannot be explained except by conductive processes or (less likely) by very deep convection (at high temperature) below the level of any of the drilling so far.…”
Section: Summary Of Ingebritsen Heat Flow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 57%