1991
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(91)90275-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat flow and heat generation in the Archaean Dharwar cratons and implications for the Southern Indian Shield geotherm and lithospheric thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature-depth calculations depend heavily on the heat production value assigned to the upper crust. Thus, for WDC and EDC, we use the detailed compilation of Gupta et al (1991) for the Dharwar craton. In case of EDC, we have not considered anomalous heat generation value of Hyderabad granitic terrain and for WDC, we restrict only to the values belonging to the Chitradurga supracrustal belt and its surrounding areas.…”
Section: Heat Flow Distribution Temperature Regime and Geoelectric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Temperature-depth calculations depend heavily on the heat production value assigned to the upper crust. Thus, for WDC and EDC, we use the detailed compilation of Gupta et al (1991) for the Dharwar craton. In case of EDC, we have not considered anomalous heat generation value of Hyderabad granitic terrain and for WDC, we restrict only to the values belonging to the Chitradurga supracrustal belt and its surrounding areas.…”
Section: Heat Flow Distribution Temperature Regime and Geoelectric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent detailed study (Pandey et al, 2002) suggests that highly radioactive granitic layer at Hyderabad does not extend beyond a kilometer or so at depth. For SGT, heat generation Gupta and Rao (1970), Gupta et al (1987Gupta et al ( , 1991, Roy and Rao (2000) and Rao et al (1976Rao et al ( , 2001. NSGT and SSGT denote Northern and Southern block of SGT.…”
Section: Heat Flow Distribution Temperature Regime and Geoelectric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seismic tomography data suggest that the West Australian Archean lithosphere is 200-300 km thick [Simons et al, 1999] and thermal modeling implies a depth of 170-230 km for the 1300°C isotherm [Artemieva and Mooney, 2001]. Assuming ∆z L = 200-250 km, ∆T L = 1280-1300°C, and uniform thermal conductivity k = 3 W m −1°C−1 for the lithosphere, equation (8) Jones, 1988;Gupta et al, 1991;Jaupart and Mareschal, 1999;Russell et al, 2001]. In fact, q m must be lower than this, perhaps by as much as 5 mW m −2 , because of the contribution of heat production in the crust [e.g., Jaupart and Mareschal, 2003].…”
Section: Archean Q Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, there are various lithospheric thicknesses, apparently in a stable equilibrium, coexisting over the convecting Earth's mantle: Secondary convection seems to bring a heat flow of the order of 40 mW/m 2 to the base of thin lithospheres; a mantle heat flow of only 15 mW/m 2 arrives at the base of the thick cratonic roots [Jones, 1988;Gupta et al, 1991;Pinet and Jaupart, 1987]. The petrological buoyancy of the cratonic lithosphere is often invoked to explain its great thickness and stability [Jordan, 1988] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%