1994
DOI: 10.1080/00102209408935367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Feedback to the Fuel Surface in Pool Fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
103
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat could be fed back to fuel surface by conductive, convective and radiative heat transfer processes. It is worth mentioning that the variation of radiative heat flux along the pool surface was essentially flat for the luminous fires, as proved by Hamins et al who used the experimental results of the 30 cm heptane and toluene pool fires [16]. In order to assess the relative contribution of the radiative heat feedback process for the fire whirl, an assumption is made that the radiative heat flux variation with the radial distance is constant in the range of r = 0 to D/2, which equals the radiative heat flux at r = D/2 calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Radiative Heat Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The heat could be fed back to fuel surface by conductive, convective and radiative heat transfer processes. It is worth mentioning that the variation of radiative heat flux along the pool surface was essentially flat for the luminous fires, as proved by Hamins et al who used the experimental results of the 30 cm heptane and toluene pool fires [16]. In order to assess the relative contribution of the radiative heat feedback process for the fire whirl, an assumption is made that the radiative heat flux variation with the radial distance is constant in the range of r = 0 to D/2, which equals the radiative heat flux at r = D/2 calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Radiative Heat Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This particle traveled a length of 1.5 cm in 1.28 seconds which is equal to traversing the final diameter of cavity (~16 cm) about 50 times in the 10 minutes burning period. This motion should not be mistaken with surface standing waves which are associated with the gas phase pulsation exerting perturbation on liquid surface [22]. To analyze the proportionality of the driving forces in the liquid fuel, Marangoni and Rayleigh numbers have been used as the relevant dimensionless groups for thermocapillary and natural convection, respectively [12].…”
Section: Discussion On Convective Flows In the Liquid Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due the higher input radiation from the flame in the center [21]. Based on the findings of Hamins et al [22], there should be a constant decrease of local heat feedback outward from the center and then a rise near the rims because of local heating of the fuel by the heat conducted through the rims to the body of the fuel. In a pool fire in ice the component of heat transfer of the flame through rims to the body of the fuel does not exist.…”
Section: Temperature Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum in case with a closed staircase is about 4.0 g/s at 330 s, which is higher than that in an open staircase. The reason is that most of the flame of pool fire is within the fire room and the unburned heptane in the pan receives more heat feedback from flame, upper hot smoke and sidewalls, leading to bigger evaporation rate and combustion rate [25]. By comparing the maximum mass loss rates of 20 cm pool size in opened staircase, it can be found that the maximum mass loss rates have slight difference under the action of stack effect, which indicates that the mass loss rate of fuel is influenced slightly by the position of window opened in the staircase.…”
Section: Mass Loss Ratementioning
confidence: 99%