2016
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.129312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat dissipation does not suppress an immune response in laboratory mice divergently selected for basal metabolic rate (BMR)

Abstract: The capacity for heat dissipation is considered to be one of the most important constraints on rates of energy expenditure in mammals. To date, the significance of this constraint has been tested exclusively under peak metabolic demands, such as during lactation. Here, we used a different set of metabolic stressors, which do not induce maximum energy expenditures and yet are likely to expose the potential constraining effect of heat dissipation. We compared the physiological responses of mice divergently selec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we cannot exclude that the H-BMR mice are more effective in using these physiological mechanisms than the L-BMR line. Irrespective of the responsible mechanisms, our results clearly show that even though SPA was indeed reduced by high ambient temperature, any potential heat stress did not preclude the H-BMR mice from expressing their genetically based higher SPA (this conclusion agrees with the results of earlier experiments on other costly traits in the same lines of mice (Książek and Konarzewski 2016;Sadowska et al 2019). Furthermore, our results suggest that the between-strain differences in SPA are not affected by thermal preferences of mice that can vary during the day (Keijer et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here, we cannot exclude that the H-BMR mice are more effective in using these physiological mechanisms than the L-BMR line. Irrespective of the responsible mechanisms, our results clearly show that even though SPA was indeed reduced by high ambient temperature, any potential heat stress did not preclude the H-BMR mice from expressing their genetically based higher SPA (this conclusion agrees with the results of earlier experiments on other costly traits in the same lines of mice (Książek and Konarzewski 2016;Sadowska et al 2019). Furthermore, our results suggest that the between-strain differences in SPA are not affected by thermal preferences of mice that can vary during the day (Keijer et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Artificial selection experiments using rodents provide some of the most compelling evidence that individuals with high EE also sustain high immune function. For example, mice selected for high resting EE had enhanced immune function and larger lymph node mass and spleen than mice selected for low resting EE, indicating that elevated energy capacity (reflected by high resting EE, see Box 1) permits greater immune response, while also permitting greater sustained activity rates [ 54 ]. In another example, rats selected for low and for high EE were exposed to breast cancer cells, and while high EE rats effectively resisted the spread of cancer, low-EE rats did not and, additionally, lost weight over time [ 42 ].…”
Section: Literature Support For Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… M1: Varkoohi et al (2010); M2: Bordas et al (1992), Gabarrou et al (1998), Morisson et al (1997), Zerjal et al (2021); M3: Johnson and McLaury (1973), McLaury and Johnson (1972); M4: Pym and Nicholls (1979); M5: Brien et al (1984), Brien and Hill (1986); M5: Brien et al (1984), Brien nad Hill (1986); M6: Al Jothery et al (2016), Hastings et al (1997), Selman et al (2001); M7: Bhatnagar and Nielsen (2014), Nielsen et al (1997); M8: Książek and Konarzewski (2016), Sadowska et al (2013); M9: Downs et al (2013); M10: Clapperton et al (2006), Kerr and Cameron (1995); M11: Chatelet et al (2018), Gilbert et al (2017); M12: Boddicker et al (2011), Cai et al (2008), Grubbs et al (2013), Young et al (2016), and M13: Arthur et al (2005), Richardson and Herd (2004). …”
Section: Survey Of Breed Comparisons and Selection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%