2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2008.915793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Conduction Problems in ${\rm SF}_{6}$ Gas Cooled-Insulated Power Transformers Solved by the Finite-Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal conductivity λ and dynamic viscosity µ are nearly not influenced by the gas pressure. Their variation with temperature is obtained by the Sutherland's law, which are, respectively, expressed as [10] (8) where λ 0 and μ 0 are, respectively, the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of the gas mixture at 0 ºC, S is the Sutherland temperature.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thermal conductivity λ and dynamic viscosity µ are nearly not influenced by the gas pressure. Their variation with temperature is obtained by the Sutherland's law, which are, respectively, expressed as [10] (8) where λ 0 and μ 0 are, respectively, the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of the gas mixture at 0 ºC, S is the Sutherland temperature.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the normal direction of tank surface, ε is emissivity, σ is Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The other one is the closed-type enclosure radiation boundary condition between the outer surface of the conductors and the inner surface of the enclosure, which is expressed as [10]…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural convective heat transfer coefficient can be determined by classical Nusselt number described as [15] ( )…”
Section: Convective Heat Transfer Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow and temperature distribution calculation methods mainly include the finite volume method (FVM), [4][5][6][7][8] finite element method (FEM), [9][10][11][12] finite difference method (FDM), and leastsquare finite element method (LSFEM). [13][14][15] The FVM has the advantages of high calculation accuracy, good numerical solution stability, and wide applicability, and it is one of the most commonly used methods in fluid mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid-solid interface and the wall surface need to be treated separately when dealing with temperature field boundary conditions. 9 For multi-media models with complex boundaries, the computational complexity will be increased significantly. The FEM is an efficient numerical calculation method that can solve various computational fluid dynamic problems, 11,16 and the continuity of heat flow density can be satisfied automatically and does not need to be treated separately as the FVM does.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%