2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat capacities of fatty acid methyl esters from 300 K to 380 K and up to 4.25 MPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). This is acceptable because the uncertainty of the calculated values of the heat capacity from the reference equation of state 35 is 5%; (2) the present derived values of isobaric heat capacities of methyl laurate agree with the reported data within 0.8% (systematically lower, Liu et al 42,43 ), 0.8% (systematically higher, van Bommel et al 44 ), 1.9% (systematically higher, Bogatishcheva et al 45 ), 0.52% (Pauly et al 46 ); (3) the present adiabatic coefficient of bulk compressibility of methyl laurate deviates from the data reported by Z ̇arska et al 25 within 0.16%; (4) the present thermal expansion coefficient of methyl laurate deviates from other reported data within 0.06% (Liew and Seng 17 ); 0.64% (Z ̇arska et al 25 ), 0.11% (Pratas et al 19 ), and 4% by Tat and Gerpen; 1 the present data of the adiabatic coefficient of bulk compressibility agrees within 1.7% (systematically lower, Tat and van Gerpen 33 ) and 0.01% (nonsystematic deviations, Z ̇arska et al 25 ). Thus, as reported in the present work, the measured density and speed of sound and the derived thermodynamic property data for methyl laurate and methyl stearate are in good agreement with the literature data and thermodynamically consistent, and therefore can be recommended for scientific and practical applications.…”
Section: Derived Thermodynamic Properties Of Methyl Laurate and Methy...supporting
confidence: 78%
“…8). This is acceptable because the uncertainty of the calculated values of the heat capacity from the reference equation of state 35 is 5%; (2) the present derived values of isobaric heat capacities of methyl laurate agree with the reported data within 0.8% (systematically lower, Liu et al 42,43 ), 0.8% (systematically higher, van Bommel et al 44 ), 1.9% (systematically higher, Bogatishcheva et al 45 ), 0.52% (Pauly et al 46 ); (3) the present adiabatic coefficient of bulk compressibility of methyl laurate deviates from the data reported by Z ̇arska et al 25 within 0.16%; (4) the present thermal expansion coefficient of methyl laurate deviates from other reported data within 0.06% (Liew and Seng 17 ); 0.64% (Z ̇arska et al 25 ), 0.11% (Pratas et al 19 ), and 4% by Tat and Gerpen; 1 the present data of the adiabatic coefficient of bulk compressibility agrees within 1.7% (systematically lower, Tat and van Gerpen 33 ) and 0.01% (nonsystematic deviations, Z ̇arska et al 25 ). Thus, as reported in the present work, the measured density and speed of sound and the derived thermodynamic property data for methyl laurate and methyl stearate are in good agreement with the literature data and thermodynamically consistent, and therefore can be recommended for scientific and practical applications.…”
Section: Derived Thermodynamic Properties Of Methyl Laurate and Methy...supporting
confidence: 78%
“…For example, Pt supported over alumina mechanically mixed with cesium salt of phosphotungstic acid was used as a catalyst for gasoline distillate conversion. [30] Additional examples include Pt promoted phosphotungstic acid, supported over high surface area supports, which catalyzed n-octane conversion, [31] and phosphotungstic acid supported over SBA-15 catalyst that was used for n-decane conversion. [32] Although POMs have been studied for biodiesel production via transesterification of plant oils, [33] their utilization in catalytic cracking and hydrocracking processes of plant oils, fatty acid esters or fatty acids, was not extensively investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the average deviations with both CPA and PCPA are lower than 1.5%, so we can still conclude that both equations can describe well the VLE properties of polar nonassociating fluids. Table shows the deviations of the calculated heat capacity with two EoS from the experiments (the values of hydrogen sulfide are from the NIST correlation). , The results indicate that although the CPA EoS may describe well the heat capacity in some cases, it still cannot give a satisfactory performance for most components, even over relatively narrow temperature and pressure regions. An example can be found in 2-octanone, for which the deviation of the heat capacity with CPA at T = 253–333 K and p = 0.1 MPa reaches 10.6%.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%