2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.12.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat capacities of (Ca,Ln)MnO3 (Ln=Pr, Nd and Sm)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the values of ΔH m are of hundreds of joules per mole, which are much smaller than the first-order structural phase transition enthalpy (3.36 kJ mol −1 ) of LaMnO 3 50 but close to the magnitude of the magnetic phase transition enthalpy of Ln 1−x Ae x MO 3 (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm; Ae = Ca, Sr; M = Cr, Mn) with second-order nature. 53,54 The magnitude of ΔH m indicates the energetic barrier of the phase transition which helps to understand the thermodynamic stability during the process of IDPT. Consequently, it can be inferred by a comparison of ΔH m that the high-temperature structural phase of the Co sample exhibits a more stable thermodynamic state in comparison to that of the Ni sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the values of ΔH m are of hundreds of joules per mole, which are much smaller than the first-order structural phase transition enthalpy (3.36 kJ mol −1 ) of LaMnO 3 50 but close to the magnitude of the magnetic phase transition enthalpy of Ln 1−x Ae x MO 3 (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm; Ae = Ca, Sr; M = Cr, Mn) with second-order nature. 53,54 The magnitude of ΔH m indicates the energetic barrier of the phase transition which helps to understand the thermodynamic stability during the process of IDPT. Consequently, it can be inferred by a comparison of ΔH m that the high-temperature structural phase of the Co sample exhibits a more stable thermodynamic state in comparison to that of the Ni sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%