1991
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90253-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat capacities and volumes of alkyldimethylphosphine and arsine oxides in water at 25°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also be pointed out that our earlier value obtained from continuous enthalpy titrations in H 2 O at four temperatures 19 is within experimental error of the result from Method 4 (with no allowance for a possible temperature variation of Δ C p ° in either case). The value obtained from direct heat capacity measurements was slightly lower than our current calorimetric values.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…It may also be pointed out that our earlier value obtained from continuous enthalpy titrations in H 2 O at four temperatures 19 is within experimental error of the result from Method 4 (with no allowance for a possible temperature variation of Δ C p ° in either case). The value obtained from direct heat capacity measurements was slightly lower than our current calorimetric values.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, the current values of ΔCp° in water for C 8 DPO and C 10 DPO obtained by titration calorimetry (−77 ± 3 and −123 ± 2 cal/(mol·K)) may be compared with corresponding values from direct measurements of the apparent molar heat capacity 16 of −110 to −117 and −115 to −129 cal/(mol·K) depending upon the model used for extrapolation of the data to the cmc and the value of −133 ± 16 for C 10 DPO from continuous titration calorimetry . The importance of the procedure used to obtain thermodynamic values for the micellization process from calorimetric data can be appreciated by comparing the enthalpy change of 8 ± 1 kJ/mol reported by Perron et al for C 6 DPO and an extrapolated value of 15 kJ/mol from the work of Clint and Walker. This apparent discrepancy results from the manner by which the data were treated rather than to differences in the measured values themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a change of slope at the c.m.c. of a surfactant has been reported by Perron et al 15 Values for the Rayleigh scattering at an angle of 90°, measured at a temperature of 25 °C, as function of concentration, are shown in Fig. 3; the sharp increase in scattering which occurs at concentrations approaching 0.04 m indicates the appearance of larger particles, the micelles in fact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Heats of dilution measurements, at 25 °C, as a function of the initial concentration of the solution, Fig. 3, also show a sharp change of slope, in this case at 0.035 m, yet again indicating a major change in the solution state of the solute, from monomer to micelle 15 has occurred.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%