2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-009-0533-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat- and mass-transport in aqueous silica nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle type may play a role. In this study a silica nanofluid was used and our results are similar to Turanov and Tolmachev [16]who also investigated a silica nanofluid and reported a 25% 1 H self-diffusion coefficient reduction at a 23% nanoparticle volume fraction. Why particle type matters is unclear, nanoparticle Brownian motion creating a zone of influence is proposed by others [17,18]) to explain enhancement results, but this same motion and effect would be expected independent of particle type.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Particle type may play a role. In this study a silica nanofluid was used and our results are similar to Turanov and Tolmachev [16]who also investigated a silica nanofluid and reported a 25% 1 H self-diffusion coefficient reduction at a 23% nanoparticle volume fraction. Why particle type matters is unclear, nanoparticle Brownian motion creating a zone of influence is proposed by others [17,18]) to explain enhancement results, but this same motion and effect would be expected independent of particle type.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Veilleux and Coulombe [24] measured the tracer mass diffusion of Rhodamine 6G in alumina nanofluids and observed that dye diffusion coefficient at an optimum nanoparticles concentration was ten times larger than that in the de-ionized water [24]. By using the pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance method, Turanov and Tolmachev [25] and Gerardi et al [26] measured the selfdiffusion coefficient of water in the aqueous suspension of SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles, respectively. They showed that nanoparticles decreased mass diffusion coefficients by about 30 and 10 %, respectively [25,26].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By using the pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance method, Turanov and Tolmachev [25] and Gerardi et al [26] measured the selfdiffusion coefficient of water in the aqueous suspension of SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles, respectively. They showed that nanoparticles decreased mass diffusion coefficients by about 30 and 10 %, respectively [25,26]. Ozturk et al [27] reported that the Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles did not affect mass diffusion.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xie et al (2008) showed the dependency of nanofluid viscosity on shear rates, although the effect is minimal for concentrations less than 3.0 vol%. For the diffusion coefficient under the excluded volume diffusion regime, a reduction in the value of D is expected as volume fraction of the obstructive phase (NPs) increases (Turanov and Tolmachev 2009). Joensson et al (1986) suggested a simple model for diffusion of nanofluids, which can be used for nano-CO 2 :…”
Section: Effective Properties Of Brine Saturated With Nano-comentioning
confidence: 98%