2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0100-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat and mass transfer in deep-frying of pumpkin, sweet potato and taro

Abstract: Heat and mass transfer parameters, effective thermal diffusivity, heat transfer coefficient, effective moisture diffusivity and moisture transfer coefficient-for pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) under deep-frying conditions were determined by fitting experimental data on transient values of temperature and moisture content to the solution of the standard diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates as modified by Dincer (Heat Mass Transfer 32:109-113, 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 135C, thermal and moisture diffusions were almost equal, but moisture diffusion superseded thermal diffusion at 145C. The Les obtained for pantoa are comparable with the value of 2.35 reported by Dincer () for potato and 1.7, 2.6 and 3.3 reported by Ahromrit and Nema () for taro, sweet potato and pumpkin, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…At 135C, thermal and moisture diffusions were almost equal, but moisture diffusion superseded thermal diffusion at 145C. The Les obtained for pantoa are comparable with the value of 2.35 reported by Dincer () for potato and 1.7, 2.6 and 3.3 reported by Ahromrit and Nema () for taro, sweet potato and pumpkin, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On the contrary, it is hypothesized that the hindrance to heat transfer arose from the large pores that formed inside the product due to loss of moisture, which slowed down conduction of heat inside the product. Similar results were reported for potatoes (Dincer 1996) and pumpkin, sweet potatoes and taro (Ahromrit and Nema 2010).…”
Section: Relationship Between Thermal and Moisture Diffusivitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These obtained values are into the range reported by Troncoso and Pedreschi (2009) [17] for water diffusion in the potato issue during vacuum frying (8.57 × 10 -9 and 1.21 × 10 -8 m 2 s -1 for a temperature range between 120 °C and 140 °C). However, study data were lower to be obtained by Ahromrit y Nema (2010) [18], which found a diffusivity coefficient of 4.97 × 10 −7 m 2 s -1 in atmospheric frying of cylindrical Malanga Slices at frying temperature of 180 °C.…”
Section: A Moisture Contentcontrasting
confidence: 70%