1994
DOI: 10.2307/3809687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heartwood, Sapwood, and Fungal Decay Associated with Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Cavity Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heart rots are relevant to woodpeckers because they decay the interior heartwood of a tree without affecting the integrity of the more exterior sapwood (Kilham 1971, Conner et al 1994). This pattern of decay questions the relevance of a visual cue produced by a heart rot that is detectable and useful for woodpeckers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heart rots are relevant to woodpeckers because they decay the interior heartwood of a tree without affecting the integrity of the more exterior sapwood (Kilham 1971, Conner et al 1994). This pattern of decay questions the relevance of a visual cue produced by a heart rot that is detectable and useful for woodpeckers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They hypothesized that fire history strongly influenced the balance between herbaceous and woody vegetation, and that arthropod abundance, particularly ants, was affected by changes in the ground cover composition. Red-cockaded woodpeckers forage primarily on arthropods on living or dying pine trees (Conner et al 1994), but the dynamics of ground cover quality and arthropod abundance on pine trees is poorly understood.…”
Section: Red-cockaded Woodpecker Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longleaf pine height has been examined using multifractal analysis to determine understory light availability (Drake and Weishampel 2000), growth response to changes in understory vegetation (Harrington and Edwards 1999), and seedling height in relation to seasonal prescribed burnings (Grelen 1983) and herbicide application (Haywood 2000). Tree-diameter studies of longleaf pine have related trunk size and heartwood diameter to red-cockaded woodpecker habitat (Conner et al 1994;Hanula, Franzerb, and Pepper 2000) and silvicultural practices to stand dynamics (i.e., Harrington 2011). Although these studies have discussed various longleaf pine morphology topics, no study has explicitly tested if longleaf pine morphological characteristics significantly change across a geographical gradient with distinct topoedaphic differences.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%