2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-013-0663-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heartwood of Cupressus lusitanica, C. macrocarpa, Leyland and Ovens cypress and prediction of its durability using near-infrared spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the C. lusitanica wood, which was considered highly resistant, are consistent with those found by Jones et al (2013), which after performing laboratory tests concluded that C. lusitanica wood was resistant to the Gloephyllum trabeum and Trametes versicolor fungi, but was less resistant to the Coniophora puteana fungi. However, the mass loss in none of the cases exceeded 6%, and was classified as very durable or highly resistant.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results obtained for the C. lusitanica wood, which was considered highly resistant, are consistent with those found by Jones et al (2013), which after performing laboratory tests concluded that C. lusitanica wood was resistant to the Gloephyllum trabeum and Trametes versicolor fungi, but was less resistant to the Coniophora puteana fungi. However, the mass loss in none of the cases exceeded 6%, and was classified as very durable or highly resistant.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…2) not as good as the EC model (R 2 = 0.87) . Successful use of NIR to predict ML by decay fungi were also reported for Sequoia sempervirens (Jones et al, 2011) as well as Cupressus lusitanica and C. macrocarpa (Jones et al, 2013). Factors contributing to the lower performance of the ML models were the fact that ML measurements were likelyare less precise than EC measurements and that mass loss by decay fungi wasis not only affected by chemical wood features like heartwood extractives (Hawley et al, 1924) but also by physical and anatomical features like density and porosity (Taylor et al, 2002), which arewere not directly represented in NIR spectra.…”
Section: Calibrating Nir For Mass Loss In E Bosistoana Heartwoodmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…More recently, Kokutse et al 26 found that NIR spectroscopy could be used for the rapid evaluation of shrinkage and fibre saturation point either on teakwood meal and solid. Amusant et al 43 developed successfully a method to predict teak natural durability by using reduced size sample materials as Jones et al 46,47 on cypress and sequoia, respectively, and Bush et al on sugar gum. 48 This is the first report of NIR spectroscopy being used for the evaluation of teak wood total phenolics and individual quinones (4¢,5¢-dihydroxy-epiisocatalponol, 2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone and tectoquinone).…”
Section: Prediction Of Phenolic Compounds On Ground Teak Heartwoodmentioning
confidence: 99%