2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2016.7592153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart sound segmentation using fractal decomposition

Abstract: In order to assist cardiac diagnosis by phonocardiography, the automated identification of fundamental heart sounds for heart beat segmentation in a cardiac cycle plays a significant role in signal processing. Recent advancements in signal processing have also shown the potential of multifractality in biomedical applications. Hence, in this paper, the multifractal property of heart sounds is utilized to identify first and second heart sounds. The root mean square (rms) fluctuation used to obtain multifractal/s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The segmentation performance of the proposed hybrid method is compared with various benchmark methods and the results are tabulated in Table 6. The methods used for comparison are VMD-SEE [10], FD [13], improved EMD [8], wavelet [26], and adaptive wavelet [26]. It is clear from extracted Hilbert envelope from first mode, e detected boundaries after thresholding, f denoised PCG signal with starting and ending locations of fundamental heart sounds [8] Own data --99.74 -Adap.…”
Section: Evaluation Using Performance Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The segmentation performance of the proposed hybrid method is compared with various benchmark methods and the results are tabulated in Table 6. The methods used for comparison are VMD-SEE [10], FD [13], improved EMD [8], wavelet [26], and adaptive wavelet [26]. It is clear from extracted Hilbert envelope from first mode, e detected boundaries after thresholding, f denoised PCG signal with starting and ending locations of fundamental heart sounds [8] Own data --99.74 -Adap.…”
Section: Evaluation Using Performance Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the detection is done based on VMD algorithm. Logistic-regression technique [12], multifractal approach [13], deep neural network with mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features [1], hidden Markov model (HMM) [14] are also proposed for fundamental heart sound segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many processing and classification methods about heart sounds have been proposed such as wavelet transform (WT), hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM), logistic regression (LR), Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), deep neural network (DNN), deep convolutional neural network (CNN), Multi-fractal decomposition, Shannon energy and SVM [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. The feature extraction methods were mainly based on these features, including short-time Fourier transform (STFT) features, kurtosis features, the wavelet features, deep structured features and the statistical features [ 3 , 5 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction: Accurate and reliable recognition of the fundamental heart sounds (FHSs) in a cardiac cycle of the phonocardiogram (PCG) signal plays a vital role in valvular split, cardiac stress, pulmonary artery pressure analysis, left ventricular pressure rise (LV dP/dt) measure, non-invasive blood pressure estimation and human identification [1][2][3][4][5]. In the past years, many S1/S2 sound recognition methods were presented based on variety of preprocessing and feature extraction techniques and classifiers such as logistic regression-hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM) and wavelet transform (WT) [4], mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) [6], multifractal decomposition [7], deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector machine (SVM) [8], ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and kurtosis features [9], total variation and Shannon energy (SE) [10], S-transform [11], empirical mode decomposition (EMD) WT algorithm with SE [12], Hilbert transform and adaptive thresholding [13], expert frequency-energy based metric [14], matching pursuit [15], duration-dependent hidden Markov model (HMM) [16], sound energy [17], high-frequency signatures (HFSs) [18], homomorphic envelogram and self-organising probabilistic model [19], adaptive sub-level tracking and Shannon-energy tracking [20], probabilistic models [21], time-delay neural network (NN) [22], NN and conventional classifiers [23], and spectral tracking [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [6] proposed S1 and S2 recognition algorithm based on the MFCCs and DNNs. Thomas et al [7] proposed the multifractal property-based method to identify S1 and S2 heart sounds (HSs). Tschannen et al [8] proposed a robust method for HS classification that combines a deep CNN-based feature extractor and an SVM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%