2015 8th International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (SIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/sip.2015.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart Sound Segmentation toward Automated Heart Murmur Classification in Pediatric Patents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of Still's murmur varies between 90 and 170 Hz, and pathological murmurs are in the range of 80–500 Hz ( 32 ). The next step was the application of a previously reported segmentation technique that identified S1 and S2 sound lobes in the recording and used them to identify individual cardiac cycles ( 18 , 30 ). We defined a cardiac cycle as the period between the onsets of two consecutive S1 sounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency of Still's murmur varies between 90 and 170 Hz, and pathological murmurs are in the range of 80–500 Hz ( 32 ). The next step was the application of a previously reported segmentation technique that identified S1 and S2 sound lobes in the recording and used them to identify individual cardiac cycles ( 18 , 30 ). We defined a cardiac cycle as the period between the onsets of two consecutive S1 sounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of our work has been automated algorithmic identification of Still's murmur, specifically. We have reported an algorithm for segmenting cardiac cycles and identifying Still's murmur using traditional machine learning ( 18 , 30 ). With the acquisition of additional data, we describe here a deep-learning algorithm based on a CNN framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], PCG signals were denoised using the maximally flat magnitude (Butterworth) filter. The authors in [24][25][26][27] applied wavelet transformation (WT), a well-known denoising technique to identify true PCG signal components. Another PCG signal denoising method can be achieved via EMD, where complicated data are decomposed into a finite-small number of components [28].…”
Section: Pcg Signal Preprocessing Denoising and Enhancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi and Jiang made a comparative study about the most used envelope-based methods: Shannon energy, Hilbert transform, and the casdiac Sound characteristic waveform (CSCW) [31]. Shannon energy and entropy envelope was used by [25,26,[32][33][34][35][36]. Other techniques use envelope extraction based on WT to gain the frequency characteristics of of S1 and S2 sound components [15].…”
Section: Pcg Signal Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digitalized signal is then analysed through an algorithm of choice. The analysis pipeline of the vast majority of all the CAD systems that Denoising techniques (step 1) range from linear filters (such as a combination of lowpass and high-pass filters) [12][13][14][15], wavelets-based methods [15,16] and Kalman filters [17]; signal segmentation includes include ML-based methods [15], while feature extraction leverages empirical mode decomposion (EMD) [18] or information theory-based methods (such as entropy and Shannon-information) [19] and hidden Markov models [20]. Techniques employed for feature extraction (step 2) range from discrete cosine transforms (DCT) [21], discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) [22][23][24], short-time Fourier transforms (STFT) [21,25], mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC) [26,27] and Choi-Williams distributions (CWD) [25].…”
Section: (B) Automated Phonocardiogram Processing For Computer-aided Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%