2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate variability measures as predictors of in-hospital mortality in ED patients with sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Los pacientes fallecidos mostraron mayor pérdida de la variabilidad, este hallazgo concuerda con Chen y Kuo 37 , quienes demostraron la capacidad predictiva de la VFC en la mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con sepsis 37 . El uso de inotrópicos y vasopresores obedeció a protocolos de reanimación actuales 38 , estos pacientes mostraron mayor pérdida de la VFC.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Los pacientes fallecidos mostraron mayor pérdida de la variabilidad, este hallazgo concuerda con Chen y Kuo 37 , quienes demostraron la capacidad predictiva de la VFC en la mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con sepsis 37 . El uso de inotrópicos y vasopresores obedeció a protocolos de reanimación actuales 38 , estos pacientes mostraron mayor pérdida de la VFC.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…1,6,11 This may explain differing performances with respect to predictive ability over other frequency domain parameters in the intensive care setting. 3 HRV is increasingly gaining popularity as a predictor of outcome in a variety of clinical environments, including trauma patients, 12 critically ill emergency department 4 patients, 13 septic patients on admission to ED, 14 and the haemodynamically stable trauma patient. 15 It has also been used to predict outcomes such as hypotension during obstetric spinal hypotension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects were divided into three groups by age: group I (n¼ 10; age range, 21-26 years), group II (n¼10; age range, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and group III (n¼10; age range, 40-49 years) [23]. The subjects had no reported heart-related or internal diseases.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%