2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65355-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart Rate Variability Analysis with the R package RHRV

Abstract: of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
46
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated LF power during the baseline period (5 min). Also, we estimated LF power over several contiguous 5-min recording windows during the task, and then computed the average power in this band across the windows (García-Martínez et al, 2017). Importantly, groups did not differ in the length of the task recordings (control, mean duration = 1325.4 s, SD = 306.8; attorneys, mean duration = 1401.4 s, SD = 309.2; judges, mean duration = 1411.3 s, SD = 313.7; F 2, 83 = 0.53, p = 0.53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated LF power during the baseline period (5 min). Also, we estimated LF power over several contiguous 5-min recording windows during the task, and then computed the average power in this band across the windows (García-Martínez et al, 2017). Importantly, groups did not differ in the length of the task recordings (control, mean duration = 1325.4 s, SD = 306.8; attorneys, mean duration = 1401.4 s, SD = 309.2; judges, mean duration = 1411.3 s, SD = 313.7; F 2, 83 = 0.53, p = 0.53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the RR time series, we used the RQA parameters: recurrence rate (REC), determinism (DET), LMAX, LMEAN, LAM, maximal vertical length (Vmax), TT, and Shannon entropy (ShanEn) (Martínez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority are dedicated to analysis of HRV [ 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], with a few designed specifically for investigation of the EEG [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Many HRV analysis tools—such as Kubios HRV [ 13 ], HRVAS [ 21 ], HRVFrame [ 14 ], gHRV [ 7 ], HRVAnalysis [ 15 ], RHRV [ 22 , 23 ], RR-APET [ 10 ] and PyBioS [ 24 ]—include a selection of complexity and entropy methods, although some older ones offer only a single such measure [ 13 , 25 , 26 ], and others such as PyHRV are not in GUI form [ 27 ]. We found only one EEG-specific software whose main focus is on complexity or entropy measures [ 5 ], although a complexity toolkit for resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was located, also containing a handful of entropy measures [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%