1983
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198315010-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate indices of the anaerobic threshold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is similar to findings of Parkhouse et al (1982), Dressendorfer et al (1981) and Dwyer and Bybee (1983) who observed that HRs at AT expressed as a percentage of maximal cardiac frequency were 84, 86, 88 and 86.3% for trained, highly trained, normal males and normal women respectively. Other investigators, using rowing ergometers, found that the mean HR values at AT were 167 and 168 beats.min-1 for international and national rowers (Mahler et al, 1984;Mickelson and Hagerman, 1982).…”
Section: Discussion Lactic Acid Removalsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This value is similar to findings of Parkhouse et al (1982), Dressendorfer et al (1981) and Dwyer and Bybee (1983) who observed that HRs at AT expressed as a percentage of maximal cardiac frequency were 84, 86, 88 and 86.3% for trained, highly trained, normal males and normal women respectively. Other investigators, using rowing ergometers, found that the mean HR values at AT were 167 and 168 beats.min-1 for international and national rowers (Mahler et al, 1984;Mickelson and Hagerman, 1982).…”
Section: Discussion Lactic Acid Removalsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, this solution does not take into account the balance between the underlying metabolic processes (aerobic and anaerobic), which may differ between two individuals exercising at the same percentage of their maximal capacity, even if these individuals are of the same sex and of similar age, health and activity status (e.g. Dwyer & Bybee, 1983;Katch, Weltman, Sady, & Freedson, 1978). Consequently, it does not provide an adequate standardization of the exercise stimulus across individuals, particularly if one considers the multitude of cardiovascular, biochemical, neuroendocrine and, as we will show, affective changes that take place as the organism transitions between the aerobic and anaerobic modes of operation.…”
Section: Two Methodological Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations based on the relative-percentage concept may induce multiple training stimuli in subjects, which have been thought to result in a wide range of improvements in cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables (Dwnyer and Bybee 1983). This would suggest that an exercise intensity based on this concept has limited usefulness in ensuring that a desired level of metabolic stress is attained for all subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%