2019
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-6574201900010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate deflection point as an alternative to determining the anaerobic threshold in dyslipidaemic patients

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to verify the agreement between the ventilatory method (VT) and the alternative method of heart rate deflection point (HRDP) in determining the anaerobic threshold (AT) during incremental treadmill test in dyslipidaemic patients. Methods: Twenty-seven dyslipidaemic patients (61.50 ± 10.46 years) performed an incremental treadmill test, in which the AT was determined using both methods. Bland-Altman statistics was adopted in order to verify the agreement between the methods. Res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 For example, a study involving cycle ergometer performance showed a strong correlation between HRDP and AT determined by ventilatory threshold ( r = 0.90, p < 0.001), with no significant differences. 34 As well, when HRDP was compared with AT verified by blood lactate during a running test, it also showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.84, p < 0.0001) without significant differences between both methods ( p > 0.05). 26 This relation has been reinforced by the absence of differences during repeated tests, which suggests that it is a reliable method to find the HRDP, 32 which can be easily identified in individuals with higher training levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…32 For example, a study involving cycle ergometer performance showed a strong correlation between HRDP and AT determined by ventilatory threshold ( r = 0.90, p < 0.001), with no significant differences. 34 As well, when HRDP was compared with AT verified by blood lactate during a running test, it also showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.84, p < 0.0001) without significant differences between both methods ( p > 0.05). 26 This relation has been reinforced by the absence of differences during repeated tests, which suggests that it is a reliable method to find the HRDP, 32 which can be easily identified in individuals with higher training levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…32 For example, a study involving cycle ergometer performance showed a strong correlation between HRDP and AT determined by ventilatory threshold (r = 0.90, p \ 0.001), with no significant differences. 34 As well, when HRDP was compared with AT verified by blood lactate during a running test, it also showed a strong correlation (r = 0.84, p \ 0.0001) without significant differences between both methods (p . 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%