25Dopamine antagonist drugs have profound effects on locomotor activity. In 26 particular, the administration of the D2 antagonist haloperidol produces a state that is 27 similar to catalepsy. In order to confirm whether the modulation of the dopaminergic 28 activity produced by haloperidol can act as an unconditioned stimulus, we carried out 29 two experiments in which the administration of haloperidol was repeatedly paired with 30 the presence of distinctive contextual cues that served as a Conditioned Stimulus.31 Paradoxically, the results revealed a dose-dependent increase in locomotor activity 32 following conditioning with dopamine antagonist (Experiments 1) that was susceptible of 33 extinction when the conditioned stimulus was presented repeatedly by itself after 34 conditioning (Experiment 2). These data are interpreted from an associative 35 perspective, considering them as a result of a classical conditioning process. 36 37 38 Keywords: Classical Conditioning; Haloperidol; Dopamine; Locomotor Activity 3 39 Introduction 40An inherent characteristic of nature is change and, throughout the process of 41 evolution, organisms endowed with a complex nervous system have developed 42 psychological mechanisms that allow for anticipating these changes and producing 43 responses that facilitate adaptation to the environment. One such mechanism is that of 44 classical or Pavlovian conditioning, which has been proposed as a fundamental process 45 to explain how organisms learn to respond adaptively in anticipation of the occurrence 46 of environmental events (1,2). In fact, there are numerous examples that illustrate the 47 relevance of classical conditioning in the field of the study of emotional processes (3,4),48 in the acquisition of eating habits (5,6) or its usefulness for the analysis and treatment of 49 certain pathologies (7,8), among many others.
50Another area in which the adaptive relevance of Pavlovian associations has been 51 demonstrated is related to the effects of repeatedly presenting a neutral stimulus 52 accompanied by the effects of a drug. This procedure has led to seemingly 53 contradictory results, since while in some cases the Conditioned Response (CR) that 54 appears has been similar to that produced by the drug (9,10), on other occasions the 55 CR has been of an opposite nature to that induced by the drugs (11,12). Eikelboom & 56 Stewart (1982) have proposed that the origin of these differences could be related to the 57 effect of the drug on the nervous system: whilst on some occasions the Conditional 58 Stimulus (CS) is associated with an Unconditioned Response (UR) dependent on the 59 central nervous system, at other times the CS is associated with a peripheral UR that 60 will appear to compensate for the central effects of the drug. In the first case, the 61 association between the drug and the CS would lead to the appearance of a CR similar 4 62 to the one that is produced by the drug, while in the second case, the CR would be 63 opposite to that produced by the drug at the centra...