2005
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164x.19.3.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate arousal and excitement in gambling: Winners versus losers.

Abstract: People sometimes claim they gamble for excitement rather than money. The authors examined in a laboratory analog whether excitement is generated by the expectancy of winning money. Eighty male undergraduate students watched a videotaped horse race with an exciting neck-to-neck finish. Half bet $1 for a chance of winning $7 if they picked the winning horse; the other half predicted the winning horse without wagering. Winning and losing were experimentally manipulated. Participants with a chance to win money sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present research are coherent with other gambling studies that suggest that achieving the prize is necessary to maintain a high the psychophysiological arousal during it (Coventry & Hudson, 2001;Lole, et al, 2012), but that having the expectation of being able to win the prize is more relevant than winning it (Ladouceur, Sévigny, Blaszczynski, O'Connor, & Lavoie, 2003;Wulfert, Roland, Hartley, Wang, & Franco, 2005). According to the design of the present research, gamblers showed this expectation in the first attempt, and especially in the betting and rotation of the roulette phases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results of the present research are coherent with other gambling studies that suggest that achieving the prize is necessary to maintain a high the psychophysiological arousal during it (Coventry & Hudson, 2001;Lole, et al, 2012), but that having the expectation of being able to win the prize is more relevant than winning it (Ladouceur, Sévigny, Blaszczynski, O'Connor, & Lavoie, 2003;Wulfert, Roland, Hartley, Wang, & Franco, 2005). According to the design of the present research, gamblers showed this expectation in the first attempt, and especially in the betting and rotation of the roulette phases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Anderson and Brown 1984;Meyer et al 2000;Coventry and Hudson 2001). Similar changes can be elicited by laboratory gambling protocols, particularly when genuine monetary rewards are at stake (Sharpe et al 1995;Ladouceur et al 2003;Wulfert et al 2005). The causal significance of these changes in arousal to the maintenance of gambling behaviour is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Naturalistic studies have described profound physiological responses during gambling, including heart rate increases (e.g. Anderson and Brown 1984;Coventry and Hudson 2001), which further scale with the game outcomes such that elevations are greatest during winning sessions (Wulfert et al 2005). As well as measuring tonic arousal over several minutes of play, recent work has begun to characterize phasic 'event-related' arousal responses, showing for example that wins and near-misses both generate increased electrodermal activity (EDA) Clark et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%