1965
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90078-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart failure in atrial septal defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,9,15 Thus, in the present study, 92% of patients had significant symptoms, and 45% were severely limited. This finding is in sharp contrast to the infrequent occurrence of disability in younger patients with ASD.A 10,21 Although objective evidences of cardiac dysfunction such as cardiac enlargement, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure, have been recognized relatively more frequently in elderly patients with ASD,'1 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 the hemodynamic alterations that accompany and may be responsible for the development of symptoms and objective evidence of impaired cardiac function have not been clearly delineated previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6,9,15 Thus, in the present study, 92% of patients had significant symptoms, and 45% were severely limited. This finding is in sharp contrast to the infrequent occurrence of disability in younger patients with ASD.A 10,21 Although objective evidences of cardiac dysfunction such as cardiac enlargement, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure, have been recognized relatively more frequently in elderly patients with ASD,'1 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 the hemodynamic alterations that accompany and may be responsible for the development of symptoms and objective evidence of impaired cardiac function have not been clearly delineated previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This finding is in sharp contrast to the infrequent occurrence of disability in younger patients with ASD.A 10,21 Although objective evidences of cardiac dysfunction such as cardiac enlargement, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure, have been recognized relatively more frequently in elderly patients with ASD,'1 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 the hemodynamic alterations that accompany and may be responsible for the development of symptoms and objective evidence of impaired cardiac function have not been clearly delineated previously. Thus, while PA hypertension has been noted with a greater frequency in older patients with ASD than in those under 40 years of age,4 6,8,10 there is only limited evidence suggesting that incapacitated patients more frequently have PA hypertension.6 It has also been considered that left ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary infections or repeated pulmonary emboli may contribute to the appearance and progression of symptoms.3 6,9,10 In the present study a clear relation between the existence of PA hypertension and the degree of symptomatic limitation was apparent. Eighty-two per cent of the patients in functional classes III and IV had PA hypertension (average PA systolic pressure, 59 mm Hg), and in 50% of this group the PA hypertension was classified as severe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It occurs with an increasing frequency from the third decade of life, and it often precedes congestive heart failure by a year or two [6], In the present series, the RAMP and PCV (or LA) MP were significantly higher in pa tients with atrial fibrillation than in those with sinus rhythm. These high atrial pressures presumably reflect left ventricular failure, as emphasized by Dexter [13], and T ikoff et al [37]. In the present study most of the left atrial pressures were estimated from the PCV pressure, and some dis crepancies may exist between these two pressures [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Postoperatively, mean RV/LV volume (± SD) decreased (3.6 ± 0.5:1 preop vs 2.1 ± 0.8:1 postop, p < 0.001; normal subjects 1.3 ± 0.1:1), PFR increased (2.13 ± 0.57/sec vs 3. 16 1.19/sec,p < 0.01; normal subjects 2.92 ± 1.28/sec) and EF was unchanged (0.62 ± 0.12 vs 0.69 ± 0.09; NS; normal subjects 0.66 ± 0.08). In three older patients a low LV EF returned to normal postoperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%