Much effort and consideration has been given to designing and implementing appropriate physician training to engender germane skills to care for patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD), a population which is growing in both size and complexity. 1 In the United States, the current training pathway allows for physicians who have completed either a pediatric or adult cardiology fellowship to pursue a two-year fellowship which allows one to become eligible to take the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Certification Exam offered by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). With an estimated population of well over one million individuals and only ~300 board-certified ACHD specialists, 2,3 the need for "generalists" in ACHD is paramount. However, it is very likely that subspecialization within the ACHD specialty is additionally necessary to optimize care for patients. ACHD-specific expertise is needed in focused areas including surgery, cardiac catheterization, electrophysiology, critical care, and advanced heart failure. 4 Despite the present and future needs in these disciplines, there are no clear pathways for trainees to gain a specific knowledge and skill set for ACHD subspecialty training. While all the aforementioned experts are necessary to improve the care and outlook for ACHD patients, perhaps one of the most pressing issues is the need to address the significant problem of heart failure in the ACHD population.
AbstractHeart failure is an emerging issue with important implications in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Practitioners with expertise in both adult congenital heart disease and heart failure are needed to manage this growing and often complex population. In the United States, the optimal training pathway to enable practitioners to best care for these patients is ill-defined. This article explores possibilities and issues that interested trainees may encounter during their training experience.