2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185153.54457.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing Preservation and Facial Nerve Outcomes in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Results Using the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach

Abstract: By achieving excellent exposure and using meticulous microsurgical technique, it is possible to resect small vestibular schwannomas via the middle fossa approach, with preservation of hearing at excellent or preoperative levels in the majority of patients, with excellent or satisfactory facial nerve outcomes in 96% of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The adherence of the tumor shell to the nerve itself and, tumor size and form usually determine the intensity of mechanical manipulation during dissection of tumor. Our 6 month follow up results for facial nerve preservation was similar and comparable to other reports [4,7,33,39,41,[43][44][45]. Therefore, the use of the laser in proximity of the nerve seems to be safe enough and is recommended especially when having a direct view of the facial nerve such as in the RS approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The adherence of the tumor shell to the nerve itself and, tumor size and form usually determine the intensity of mechanical manipulation during dissection of tumor. Our 6 month follow up results for facial nerve preservation was similar and comparable to other reports [4,7,33,39,41,[43][44][45]. Therefore, the use of the laser in proximity of the nerve seems to be safe enough and is recommended especially when having a direct view of the facial nerve such as in the RS approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…59 The need for a new hearing classification system has also been suggested. 5 Ideally, a universally accepted system-specifically for VS outcome classification and reporting-that considers tumor size, hearing, and facial function would be desirable and practical.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revision surgery is only necessary if LSD is unsuccessful or if the CSF leakage is very intense and has already led to signs of CSF deficiency. Surgical intervention for persisting CSF leaks is rare and reported to be between 0%-2% [3,10,13,15] . In our series, re-exploration was only needed in three patients.…”
Section: Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Becker et al [10] as well as several other groups also found it to be the most common complication regardless of the approach. The incidence of CSF leaking after surgery via MFA is specified to be between 4% and 19% [2,3,[10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakagementioning
confidence: 99%