2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing impairment is associated with enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope

Abstract: Elevated hearing thresholds in hearing impaired adults are usually compensated by providing amplification through a hearing aid. In spite of restoring hearing sensitivity, difficulties with understanding speech in noisy environments often remain. One main reason is that sensorineural hearing loss not only causes loss of audibility but also other deficits, including peripheral distortion but also central temporal processing deficits. To investigate the neural consequences of hearing impairment in the brain unde… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
76
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
14
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Petersen et al (2017) reported that adults with a higher degree of hearing loss showed a higher neural tracking of the ignored speech and no change in the attended stream, suggesting that they experience more difficulties inhibiting irrelevant information. Although Mirkovic et al (2019) and Presacco et al (2019) did not report a neural difference between the two populations, Decruy et al (2020) and Fuglsang et al (2020) observed, in contrast to Petersen et al (2017), an enhanced neural tracking in HI listeners for the attended-speech compared to their normal-hearing peers. This enhancement can indicate a compensation mechanism: HI listeners need to compensate for the degraded auditory input and therefore show increased cortical neural responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Petersen et al (2017) reported that adults with a higher degree of hearing loss showed a higher neural tracking of the ignored speech and no change in the attended stream, suggesting that they experience more difficulties inhibiting irrelevant information. Although Mirkovic et al (2019) and Presacco et al (2019) did not report a neural difference between the two populations, Decruy et al (2020) and Fuglsang et al (2020) observed, in contrast to Petersen et al (2017), an enhanced neural tracking in HI listeners for the attended-speech compared to their normal-hearing peers. This enhancement can indicate a compensation mechanism: HI listeners need to compensate for the degraded auditory input and therefore show increased cortical neural responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To ensure a comfortable level, the overall level was adjusted on a subject-specific basis in addition to the linear amplification so that the stimulus was minimally effortful and comfortable to listen to. The individual presentation levels are reported by Decruy et al (2020).…”
Section: Stimuli Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to the above mentioned features, and particularly responses to the speech envelope, have been studied quite extensively in recent years (e.g. ; Verschueren et al (2019); Decruy et al (2019Decruy et al ( , 2020). In contrast, research that analyses continuous responses with an f0-based feature (f0-tracking), targetting subcortical acoustic processing, is just emerging: Forte et al (2017) developed a method to process continuous f0 responses based on crosscorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined effects of age (Presacco et al, 2016;Decruy et al, 2019;Zan et al, 2020) and hearing loss (Millman et al, 2017;Decruy et al, 2020) on continuous speech processing in the context of envelope tracking. Generally, these studies have demonstrated that older adults and those with hearing loss exhibit exaggerated cortical tracking of speech envelope both in quiet and in the presence of a competing speaker, as reflected by higher envelope reconstruction accuracies from delta-band EEG or MEG responses in these populations.…”
Section: Relationship To Existing Work On Age-effects On Electrophysimentioning
confidence: 99%