Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3371382.3378285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing a Nose?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When people think of robots, they usually have an image of a human-like machine in their minds: an apparatus with arms, legs, and a head, covered in metal or possibly silicone skin (see Cave et al, 2020; Mara et al, 2020). Even though such robots hardly, if at all, exist in our everyday lives, media reports about engineering advancements and science fiction stories about the – sometimes more, sometimes less peaceful – relationship between humans and their robotic counterparts have long made us wonder what it would be like if humanoid machines were really among us.…”
Section: Human-like Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When people think of robots, they usually have an image of a human-like machine in their minds: an apparatus with arms, legs, and a head, covered in metal or possibly silicone skin (see Cave et al, 2020; Mara et al, 2020). Even though such robots hardly, if at all, exist in our everyday lives, media reports about engineering advancements and science fiction stories about the – sometimes more, sometimes less peaceful – relationship between humans and their robotic counterparts have long made us wonder what it would be like if humanoid machines were really among us.…”
Section: Human-like Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gong and Lai [62] found that mixing a human voice with a TTS at the same time led to poorer performance, even though people thought that they had performed better and found that version of the system easier to use. In a novel approach to exploring perceived embodiment, Mara et al [107] had participants draw the body based on the voice, finding that humanlike voices were given ears, eyes, and noses, and synthetic voices were given wheels.…”
Section: Anthropomorphism Humanlikeness and Natural Vs Synthetic Voicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulation and perception checks of designed features should become a staple of research designs. Explorations of voice and body can use audiovisual matching checks or even having participants draw the body from the voice [107]. Further, these should be done before the final study or prototype version as well as after other measures have been collected to avoid unintended effects, such as stereotype threats [168].…”
Section: Incorporation Of Rigorous and Relevantmentioning
confidence: 99%