2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy full-term infants’ brain responses to emotionally and linguistically relevant sounds using a multi-feature mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm

Abstract: We evaluated the feasibility of a multi-feature mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm in studying auditory processing of healthy newborns. The aim was to examine the automatic change-detection and processing of semantic and emotional information in speech in newborns. Brain responses of 202 healthy newborns were recorded with a multi-feature paradigm including a Finnish bi-syllabic pseudo-word/ta-ta/as a standard stimulus, six linguistically relevant deviant stimuli and three emotionally relevant stimuli (happy, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
20
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The multi-feature paradigm used in this study was originally developed by Pakarinen et al (2014), and also used in our previous studies with a reduced number of deviant sounds (Kostilainen et al, 2018(Kostilainen et al, , 2020. The paradigm consisted of a 336 ms Finnish bi-syllabic pseudoword /ta-ta/ as a standard sound (with 46% probability, 700 in each block).…”
Section: Multi-feature Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-feature paradigm used in this study was originally developed by Pakarinen et al (2014), and also used in our previous studies with a reduced number of deviant sounds (Kostilainen et al, 2018(Kostilainen et al, , 2020. The paradigm consisted of a 336 ms Finnish bi-syllabic pseudoword /ta-ta/ as a standard sound (with 46% probability, 700 in each block).…”
Section: Multi-feature Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMN is a very convenient tool for studying children, as it does not require concentration in task to be elicited ( Näätänen et al, 2010 ; for a review, see e.g., Näätänen et al, 2007 ). Regardingdevelopmental studies, it is noteworthy that already fetuses ( Huotilainen et al, 2005 ) and newborn babies show MMN-like responses ( Cheour et al, 2000 ; Trainor et al, 2001 ; Kushnerenko et al, 2002b ; Partanen et al, 2013a ) for e.g., frequency changes ( Alho et al, 1990 ), speech stimuli ( Csépe, 1995 ), musical stimuli ( Partanen et al, 2013a ) and emotional pseudo-word stimuli ( Kostilainen et al, 2018 ). Likewise, the MMN is well established in pre-schoolers ( Lovio et al, 2009 ; Lee et al, 2012 ) and in schoolchildren ( Kraus et al, 1999 ; Cheour et al, 2000 ; Datta et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG data were re‐referenced offline to the algebraic average of the mastoids. Those data were offline filtered from 1 to 20 Hz, and epochs containing external artefacts exceeding ±150 μV were removed, as done in previous studies in infants (Kostilainen et al., 2018; Kushnerenko et al., 2007; Martynova, Kirjavainen, & Cheour, 2003; Paquette et al., 2015). EEG data were split into epochs from −100 to 600 ms from stimulus onset and baseline corrected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%